We performed a comparison between Check Point Infinity and RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The good part is that you don't have to configure it, which is very convenient."
"The risk level notifications are most valuable. We get to know what kind of intrusion or attack is there, and we can fix a problem on time."
"Some of the valuable features on the email side are anti-phishing, anti-malware, and Safe Links."
"The deployment capability is a great feature."
"Safe attachments, safe links, policies, and the ability to protect from zero-day threats are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the integration. It's a single console, so we don't have to switch around between multiple products. Another valuable feature is the ease of operations and maintenance."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 is a stable solution."
"The basic features are okay and I'm satisfied with the Defender."
"For me, one of the best features of Check Point Infinity is to be able to have the possibility of emulating the activity of attached files with malicious content in such a short time."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Infinity is the ease of use and navigation."
"It has come to reinforce the security architecture of the organization since it covers all the necessary pieces of security."
"New Check Point technologies can be found via this portal."
"It is very easy to integrate new features."
"The initial implementation was accomplished easily and without deployment problems."
"The Check Point Infinity security architecture enables organizations to fully implement all of the Zero Trust Principles."
"Offers a good wireless feature."
"The software is scalable to whatever is required, and you can also put a lot of resources in the cloud."
"The newer 11.5 version that my team is using has found it to have good mapping."
"I can have enterprise security, email security, next generation firewall security log, HIDS and NIDS logs, etc. all on the same dashboard. It makes it easy to pinpoint or correlate our server to this. I can find out if there is lateral movement. This is the biggest advantage of this solution."
"The solution is really scalable for the high-end power, enterprise customer."
"The most valuable features are the packet inspection and the automated incident response."
"The development of use cases on the SSA console is quite user friendly. This means that the security analyst or the researcher does not have to learn another language."
"It's quite economical compared to other solutions in the market."
"In some situations, it has not been able to pick impersonated emails having no attachments. Technical support definitely has a scope for improvement."
"We are always looking for others tools to increase automation on tasks. There can be better integration with other solutions, such as PowerPoint and email."
"The custom alerts have to improve a lot."
"In one of the reports I can get the exact place where a vulnerable file resides. But for that, I need to explicitly go into the device and check. If they could include that file part in the report, without my having to go to the device itself, that would help."
"They can improve their security in a way where a customer can know if all their attachments are safe or not to open through a report. The solution does its job perfectly, but it never reports to the customer whether those attachments have been stopped before or not."
"There needs to be an improvement in integrating the product to work across multiple operating systems, and to have better support for non-Microsoft file types."
"We need a separate license and we don't know how to get the license that is required."
"The visibility for the weaknesses in the system and unauthorized access can be improved."
"The console at the beginning also has the section on where to save the logs, however, if by mistake we choose a very remote area, this detail cannot be corrected unless the change of data center where the logs are housed, which is requested through support, which can become a management difficulty."
"They need to update the guides."
"One of the main improvements that can be made is the latency in the portal."
"Check Point Infinity price could improve."
"The portal is provisioned in AWS. They should improve the cloud to make it faster."
"They can improve the latency of the portal."
"The licensing model for Check Point Infinity is not clear."
"Technical support could be improved."
"There are instances where you try to run the reports and then it does not give you the desired outcome."
"The multi-tenant capabilities are lagging compared to IBM QRadar."
"The initial setup is complex. There are other solutions that are easier to implement."
"Sometimes, it gives me static when integrating Windows-based systems. It should produce a precise log of sorts as to where the problem is. For example, a few days ago because of the McAfee application firewall, I couldn't get access to the particular Windows machine. So, my team and I had to figure out by ourselves that there was a virus responsible for the obstacle. This solution should trigger a meaningful log or message indicating the reason the user or implementer can't get into the machine."
"The threat detection capability and centralizing and upgrading capability need to be improved. The threat alert capability needs to be improved as well because there is some lag time at present. They need to work on their database search too."
"The solution should have more integration capabilities with different platforms."
"Nowadays, their support is a little subpar compared to other solutions. I rate RSA support six out of 10."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Infinity is ranked 9th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 7 reviews while RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is ranked 7th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 12 reviews. Check Point Infinity is rated 9.0, while RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Infinity writes "Good visibility and analytics, helpful customer support, and enables micro-segmentation across the network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) writes "Economical with good technical support and is easily scalable". Check Point Infinity is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Skybox Security Suite and Palo Alto Networks WildFire, whereas RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, RSA enVision, Microsoft Sentinel and ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM). See our Check Point Infinity vs. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) report.
See our list of best ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) vendors.
We monitor all ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
