We performed a comparison between Check Point Infinity and Palo Alto Networks WildFire based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have full control over what our employees can do with the devices we provide them, to provide a secure and reliable network infrastructure."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Infinity is the ease of use and navigation."
"It provides fantastic visibility of security incidents through deconstructing and dissecting the threat's infection protocol."
"The product's excellent scalability features have allowed our organization to seamlessly adapt to the growing demand. The consensus mechanism and smart contract capabilities have optimized our workflow, resulting in an overall reduction in the complexity of our organization."
"The Check Point Infinity security architecture enables organizations to fully implement all of the Zero Trust Principles."
"The detection and reaction rates are good."
"A notable aspect that I appreciate is their ongoing effort to redesign the portal, giving it a fresh and centralized appearance."
"Our network security posture has improved significantly due to several factors. We've seen a 25% reduction in security incidents due to Infinity's advanced threat prevention capabilities. Additionally, the platform's automation features led to a 20% increase in operational efficiency, allowing our security teams to focus on more strategic tasks."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks WildFire is its ability to adapt to environments and its robustness."
"My primary use case for this solution is for a secure gateway."
"A good tool for file scanning and email threat detection, especially when it comes to attachments and communications."
"Being an application-based firewall, this is one of the critical focus factors along with the threat prevention services it provides."
"They have many different options with Palo Alto WildFire and the set-up is quick. If you have all the details in hand, it does not take more than 15 minutes to deploy a firewall."
"WildFire's application encryption is useful."
"The technical support is good."
"Stability is never a concern."
"The endpoint solutions offered by Check Point are not prominent enough in the market due to Check Point's poor marketing efforts."
"They need to update the guides."
"Check Point Infinity's web application is sometimes a little slow."
"One of the main improvements that can be made is the latency in the portal."
"Alert fatigue is a common issue with platforms that have strong detection capabilities. Implementing more filtering and prioritization mechanisms can help address this issue, ensuring that security teams can focus on the most critical threats."
"The console at the beginning also has the section on where to save the logs, however, if by mistake we choose a very remote area, this detail cannot be corrected unless the change of data center where the logs are housed, which is requested through support, which can become a management difficulty."
"The tool should focus on improving artificial intelligence and customer support services."
"The tool's technical support lags."
"The size of Palo Alto's cloud is big but it could be easier to use from a product management perspective."
"Palo Alto Networks WildFire could improve by adding support for manual submission of suspicious files and URLs. Additionally, it would be an advantage to add rule-based analysis. Currently, it uses only static and AI. We need to be able to analyze archive files."
"It's not really their problem, it's a problem across the board. There will always be problems with interrupted traffic. We have to set it up where we're playing a middle man game where we're stripping it out, looking at it, and then putting it back together and sending it on its way. That requires CPU cycles. And there's some overhead with that."
"The GUI is better in 8.0, but I still feel it lacks the fast response most of us desire. Logs are much quicker."
"I would give this product a rating of 9 out of 10 due to some slight issues of performance."
"In the future, I would like to see more automation in the reporting."
"The only complaint that we receive from our customers is in regards to the price."
"The product fails to offer protection when dealing with high-severity vulnerabilities, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
Check Point Infinity is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 22 reviews while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 58 reviews. Check Point Infinity is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Infinity writes "Provides robust cybersecurity with a comprehensive suite of features, expert support, and scalable cloud-based architecture, ensuring effective threat detection and continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". Check Point Infinity is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Proofpoint Email Protection and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Proofpoint Email Protection, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Fortinet FortiSandbox. See our Check Point Infinity vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.