Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

The compared Check Point Software Technologies and McAfee solutions aren't in the same category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 in EE , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 2.2% mindshare in the category. McAfee is ranked #27 in DLP , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of McAfee users who would recommend it.

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Read 17 Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reviews

334 Views
153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee Total Protection for...

Read 29 McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention reviews

489 Views
353 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

McAfee Total Protection for...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption.

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Encryption

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Encryption (7th), Mobile Data Protection (5th)

McAfee Total Protection for...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (27th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Security solutions, they serve different purposes. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is designed for Endpoint Encryption and holds a mindshare of 2.2%, up 1.3% compared to last year.
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 1.0% mindshare, down 1.4% since last year.

Endpoint Encryption

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov

Project manager at SII

Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use

I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.

Read full review

VivekGupta7

DGM at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup

There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."

"It keeps the devices well monitored."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally fine."

"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."

"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."

"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade pros

"The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for."

"The most valuable feature of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is data loss prevention."

"The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs."

"The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great."

"It can scale."

"The initial setup process was easy."

"The administrative capabilities and the interface make this product accessible and easy to use."

"The product is largely stable."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."

"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."

"When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive."

"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."

"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."

"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."

"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."

"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade cons

"We faced many issues with the solution's customer support, and it should be made customer-friendly and more responsive."

"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

"The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered."

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."

"It could improve how it deals with solar data."

"When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently."

"The solution takes up too much CPU and memory."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"It's not a cheap option."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Security Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

It is a cross-platform tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

The cost of licenses depends on the characteristics or implementation you are looking for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The product’s pricing could be cheaper.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 75% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 25% of the time

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 81% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

June 2025

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade report

Download Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade product report

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

May 2025

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

Overview

The Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides automatic security for all information on endpoint hard drives, including user data, operating system files and temporary and erased files. For maximum data protection, multi-factor pre-boot authentication ensures user identity, while encryption prevents data loss from theft.
Learn more about Full disk encryption.

Check Point Software Technologies

McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

McAfee

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

Kleberg Bank

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, ESET and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.