No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Process Automation vs Tray.io comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation
Ranking in Process Automation
37th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tray.io
Ranking in Process Automation
16th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (17th), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tray.io1.0%
CA Process Automation1.0%
Other98.0%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

SJ
Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies
Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience
We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests.  Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We took our server provisioning process from about 30 days to about 4 days on the first iteration of implementation."
"CA Process Automation manager is a very powerful production tool."
"Technical support is unequivocally excellent; in fact, the best customer service and technical support I’ve experienced during my 12 years in IT."
"PAM has the ability to integrate and build solutions that work well in CA's suite of service management products and those that are outside of service management."
"If you’re planning or looking for an application able to create process automation, stop looking."
"The value lies in just being able to automate things such that there's less human interaction and, therefore, more consistency in our automations."
"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."
"It’s a great product, extremely versatile but takes a certain skillset to use and implementation of automation can be time consuming when done properly."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by eliminating a lot of the manual work that we were having to do daily."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping to manage webhooks easily and workflows easily, and it has improved collaboration so that other clients can use webhooks."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."
"Tray.io has drastically reduced manual bulk operations across our data solutions and integrations teams, transforming multi-step manual data compares and script executions into turn-key event-driven or scheduled workflows."
"During our three to six-month evaluation pilot, automating our student enrollment sync with Tray.io delivered proper operational improvements."
 

Cons

"A lot of times they don't get resolved, but I'm okay with those kind of responses sometimes."
"I'd like to see additional form functionality and having Python as an available common script language."
"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."
"OCR capability should be added as a feature."
"Better reporting, because we have to true up our licenses every three months because we license on running concurrent processes, so we have to provide a report to CA every three months using their tool -- which never works."
"These configurations can be changed only through the installation wizard. There's no way to update such information in the administration interface, which is, in my opinion, very bad."
"The solution engine is in Java. Regardless of developments, the solution will always be limited to what Java offers."
"CA offers minimal public information pertaining to the performance drain the usage of some objects and operators introduce to processing."
"There is not much that can be improved in Tray.io. It is a good tool, but debug can be improved further and the solutions can be improved further."
"Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved."
"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."
"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."
"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."
"Native rate limit and auto-retry handling can be improved, as when hitting 429 errors or too many requests errors during high-volume API loops, Tray.io lacks native configured backoff and retry logic out-of-the-box, requiring complex custom while-loop workarounds."
"I landed on that rating because we feel that it is mediocre; it does what we need it to do more often than not, but it does not impress us as it is not always reliable and hands-off."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."
"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Construction Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
Native rate limit and auto-retry handling can be improved, as when hitting 429 errors or too many requests errors during high-volume API loops, Tray.io lacks native configured backoff and retry log...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
Tray.io serves as the core iPaaS orchestration and data ingestion engine between our primary system and numerous external platforms such as ad servers like GAM, FreeWheel, Flitepath, Facebook, ERPs...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
My advice for others looking into using Tray.io is to modularize earlier. I recommend not building massive monolithic workflows, but rather creating single-purpose callable workflows and triggering...
 

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.