No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Process Automation vs Tray.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation
Ranking in Process Automation
37th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tray.io
Ranking in Process Automation
15th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (17th), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tray.io0.9%
CA Process Automation1.0%
Other98.1%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

SJ
Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies
Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience
We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests.  Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Before implementing this product, our Problem and Change Management Processes were very poor, but nowadays, thanks to CA Process Automation (PAM), we no longer have this problem, as we now have all of the processes' rules placed inside of it."
"They were good, they helped us a lot from the beginning, from installation through the whole process, and not just their support, but also their professional services are top notch."
"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."
"PAM has the ability to integrate and build solutions that work well in CA's suite of service management products and those that are outside of service management."
"CA Process Automation manager is a very powerful production tool."
"For our use it really does very well; it provides us exactly what we need, and it runs with low-resource utilization and moves quickly."
"We took our server provisioning process from about 30 days to about 4 days on the first iteration of implementation."
"The benefits are the efficiency we achieve with such a product, as we could automate processes which were done in the past by humans, speeding up the reaction by 10 times and saving us a lot of money."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping to manage webhooks easily and workflows easily, and it has improved collaboration so that other clients can use webhooks."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by eliminating a lot of the manual work that we were having to do daily."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."
"During our three to six-month evaluation pilot, automating our student enrollment sync with Tray.io delivered proper operational improvements."
 

Cons

"OCR capability should be added as a feature."
"Although it's drag-and-drop, there's a little bit of a learning curve to use it correctly."
"I'd like to see additional form functionality and having Python as an available common script language."
"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."
"These configurations can be changed only through the installation wizard. There's no way to update such information in the administration interface, which is, in my opinion, very bad."
"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."
"Better reporting, because we have to true up our licenses every three months because we license on running concurrent processes, so we have to provide a report to CA every three months using their tool -- which never works."
"A lot of times they don't get resolved, but I'm okay with those kind of responses sometimes."
"I landed on that rating because we feel that it is mediocre; it does what we need it to do more often than not, but it does not impress us as it is not always reliable and hands-off."
"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."
"Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved."
"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."
"There is not much that can be improved in Tray.io. It is a good tool, but debug can be improved further and the solutions can be improved further."
"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."
"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Performing Arts
8%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-ce...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
We used and evaluated Tray.io for approximately three to six months during a proof of concept evaluation phase. During this period, our engineering and operation teams utilized the platform to buil...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
I give Tray.io an eight out of ten rating mostly because of how it is developer-centric and lacks a low-code platform and the pricing. The reduction in manual data tasks had a direct positive impac...
 

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.