Brinqa vs Panaseer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Brinqa Logo
198 views|130 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Panaseer Logo
249 views|57 comparisons
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
Top Answer:I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
Top Answer:Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
198
Comparisons
130
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
746
Rating
7.0
Views
249
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Vulcan Cyber logo
Compared 18% of the time.
Axonius logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Nucleus logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Avalor logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Balbix BreachControl logo
Compared 4% of the time.
Learn More
Panaseer
Video Not Available
Overview
Brinqa GRC provides a pluggable set of building blocks for meeting your IT process governance, risk management, and compliance reporting needs.

Panaseer is the first Continuous Controls Monitoring platform for enterprise security. It helps businesses make informed risk-based security decisions. The company is aiming to become the security measurement platform of choice for security leaders that are shifting to data-driven programmes.

Sample Customers
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
SCHRODERS
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company13%
Insurance Company9%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government9%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise61%

Brinqa is ranked 3rd in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) with 1 review while Panaseer is ranked 6th in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM). Brinqa is rated 7.0, while Panaseer is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Balbix BreachControl, whereas Panaseer is most compared with .

See our list of best Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) vendors.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.