We compared BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Zabbix across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: BMC TrueSight Operations Management's initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment and prerequisites, while Zabbix can range from easy to complex depending on technical skills and infrastructure. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is considered to have high pricing, suitable for enterprise customers, whereas Zabbix is free and open-source. The ROI of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is uncertain, while Zabbix has provided a return on investment for users, especially large enterprises. Customer support for both varies, with mixed reviews for BMC TrueSight Operations Management and varying experiences with Zabbix's support.
"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"
"It is breadth. It covers so many different technologies which can roll up into a single console."
"I use the solution to monitor servers, databases, Windows, Linux, and web services."
"The solution's event management capabilities are fantastic. We do a best of breed. If, on the network side, they use a different tool, we pull all that data in so that we have a single console. It's kind of like the monitor of monitors. We're able to aggregate all the different types of data sets, whether it's log data, app data, OS data, infrastructure data, or network data. We're able to aggregate all those events and then correlate and be able to say we're having an event."
"The tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events."
"The event management part of TrueSight Operations Management, in my experience, is probably the best in the market. You have endless flexibility. You can build your own rules, you have the MRL language, and you can implement any kind of logic on the alerts. It may be correlation, abstraction, or executing something as a result of the alerts. You have almost the whole range of options available for event management using the available customization."
"The most valuable features are the rich reports, high performance, and the look and feel of the WebEx webpage are very good."
"We're using native monitoring capabilities for all our server hardware, for visibility for applications, for URLs, for webpage response and accuracy, and for monitoring network throughput in a lot of particular instances. We're using lightweight protocols for pinging, for DNS, for LDAP."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"The best thing about Zabbix is the integration and the APIs that are included are very fast"
"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."
"It provides high scalability, alerting, notification, templating, and end-to-end security."
"The flexible licensing model is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. It really allows for great flexibility for companies."
"It can send messages to our ticketing system."
"Zabbix is both stable and scalable."
"It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."
"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."
"The product must provide application or service monitoring features."
"The dashboard and performance graphs should include a way to automatically schedule and export reports."
"It would be better if the initial setup and deployment were more straightforward."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"In our company, we faced some issues with the solution’s application endpoint, IP, and the physical location of the transactions."
"The solution's support service could be better."
"The solution could improve its price."
"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."
"Implementing Zabbix is difficult. I've deployed many solutions over the years, and Zabbix is the hardest to implement. You have to do some development to get it to work with IBM, Micro Focus, or HP products."
"The System Center Operations Manager can be improved."
"One of the things we don't like is that Zabbix has a license structure with a price that is high compared to the competition. It's very high, for example, compared to something like Microsoft Teams."
"As far as improvements, sometimes I get a bit frustrated when I move from a previous version to a new one because some configuration has changed—I need to investigate the documentation to deal with some configuration. But it doesn't take much time, so it's okay."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
"Zabbix isn't a great tool for cloud-specific monitoring - its connection to public clouds needs to be improved. Other areas for improvement would be the lack of dashboards and integrations."
"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 48 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 10th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 98 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, New Relic and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.