BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs ScienceLogic comparison

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

5,321 Views
2,341 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ScienceLogic and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management are competing products in the cloud management category. ScienceLogic has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while BMC Cloud offers robust features for those prioritizing feature depth.

Features: ScienceLogic provides infrastructure monitoring, advanced analytics, and automation capabilities. BMC Cloud supports lifecycle management, cloud orchestration, and hybrid cloud integration.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve in application monitoring, platform compatibility, and integration with third-party tools. BMC Cloud could enhance its dashboard customization, reduce the complexity of orchestration workflows, and improve user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is known for its straightforward deployment and strong customer service. BMC Cloud requires a more complex setup but offers high-quality support. Organizations seeking simplicity may prefer ScienceLogic, while those needing advanced capabilities may opt for BMC Cloud.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a competitive initial setup cost and delivers ROI through its effective pricing structure and customer service. BMC Cloud may have a higher setup cost but provides ROI with its rich features and lifecycle management. Cost-focused organizations might lean towards ScienceLogic, while those valuing interoperability may prefer BMC Cloud.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: March 2026).

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (42nd)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (14th), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	2.6%
BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management	0.5%
Other	96.9%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's helped us with our automation."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Allowing systems to be provisioned in a wide range of environments, such as Azure, AWS, or on-premise, reduces the level of training required as well as creates consistency across the board."

"Total build time has been reduced from four weeks to one week, then later to 24 hours."

"We have many regions where more than 10000 servers are deployed, so it helps in patching and hardening of servers."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management pros

"The stability of ScienceLogic is great."

"The product provides agentless monitoring which is based on SNMP so there's no need to install the monitoring agent on each and every server."

"The whole platform overall is very powerful."

"We lacked the power or features that the EM7 dashboards provide, and have won more than one account based on that alone."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"The power flow is great."

"ScienceLogic is an excellent all around suite of tools."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"It was complex as it does not include a good, extensive feasibility and compatibility guide."

"Going to BMC for PS is not at all recommended from my experience."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The reporting module needs work."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"Overall monitoring capabilities could be improved. We run into instances where we are not able to configure monitoring for specific things and it requires quite a bit of manual labor to accomplish these tasks."

"Use the professional services proposed solution to support private MIBs, we are encountering what appears to be poling time outs, which creates false positives."

"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Insurance Company

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

Comparisons

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 5% of the time

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 5% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Management

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC Helix

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic