BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs ScienceLogic comparison

BMC and ScienceLogic are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #44, while ScienceLogic is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. BMC holds a 0.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to ScienceLogic’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ScienceLogic users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

171 Views
44 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

1,721 Views
239 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

ScienceLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ScienceLogic and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management are competing products in the cloud management category. ScienceLogic has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while BMC Cloud offers robust features for those prioritizing feature depth.

Features: ScienceLogic provides infrastructure monitoring, advanced analytics, and automation capabilities. BMC Cloud supports lifecycle management, cloud orchestration, and hybrid cloud integration.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve in application monitoring, platform compatibility, and integration with third-party tools. BMC Cloud could enhance its dashboard customization, reduce the complexity of orchestration workflows, and improve user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is known for its straightforward deployment and strong customer service. BMC Cloud requires a more complex setup but offers high-quality support. Organizations seeking simplicity may prefer ScienceLogic, while those needing advanced capabilities may opt for BMC Cloud.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers a competitive initial setup cost and delivers ROI through its effective pricing structure and customer service. BMC Cloud may have a higher setup cost but provides ROI with its rich features and lifecycle management. Cost-focused organizations might lean towards ScienceLogic, while those valuing interoperability may prefer BMC Cloud.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (25th), Server Monitoring (13th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (21st), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."

"They need a little more self-service."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 61% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 39% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 12% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

May 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

ScienceLogic

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic

June 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. ScienceLogic report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.