Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs SonicWall Capture Client comparison

BlackBerry and SonicWall are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. BlackBerry is ranked #80, while SonicWall is ranked #43 with an average rating of 8.0. BlackBerry holds a 0.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to SonicWall’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlackBerry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Read 2 Blackberry Dynamics Apps reviews

151 Views
122 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonicWall Capture Client

Read 11 SonicWall Capture Client reviews

1,604 Views
1,075 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

SonicWall Capture Client

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SonicWall Capture Client and Blackberry Dynamics Apps serve as robust cybersecurity solutions tailored for different organizational needs. Based on user reviews, SonicWall Capture Client has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Blackberry Dynamics Apps excel in feature richness.

Features: SonicWall Capture Client is known for strong antivirus capabilities, easy integration with SonicWall products, and simplicity. Blackberry Dynamics Apps are favored for their extensive security features, comprehensive application management, and robust suite of features.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client needs better reporting functions, improved analytics, and enhanced user interface. Blackberry Dynamics Apps require more straightforward implementation processes, better ease of use, and resolutions for occasional performance issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer support. Blackberry Dynamics Apps face challenges with more complex deployment processes but benefit from highly responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client offers reasonable setup costs with a good return on investment. Blackberry Dynamics Apps have higher initial costs but provide significant long-term ROI through extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. SonicWall Capture Client

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

80th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall Capture Client

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

43rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Blackberry Dynamics Apps is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Client is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonicWall Capture Client	0.6%
Blackberry Dynamics Apps	0.1%
Other	99.3%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

A way for users to manage their credentials on the go using a stable, and scalable app

I give the solution an eight out of ten. It's hard to comment on the number of users because the feature is completely for corporate employees who have Blackberry devices, so it's hard to track how many users there are. I advise making your decision to use the solution based on the usage in the company or the demand of the business, which you are running based on the demand.

Read full review

Hesdi Triantono

Product Manager at wahana piranti teknologi

Has consistently delivered double-layer protection and simplified policy application while needing mobile compatibility and better MacOS support

A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.Occasionally, the Sentinel engine becomes unresponsive, particularly when customers do not properly restart or shutdown their systems. This requires a hard restart after installation to resolve the issue. Installation on Mac OS can be challenging, requiring multiple attempts due to version compatibility requirements. We must ensure the SonicWall Capture Client version is stable for Mac OS. The RAM usage is higher compared to SentinelOne, utilizing approximately 150 megabytes of memory. This is a common concern from customers, and reducing RAM consumption would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The mail is without a doubt the most valuable."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Considering other products, SonicWall Capture Client has two differentiators."

"The threat protection feature of SonicWall Capture Client is most valuable."

"Overall, what I love the most about SonicWall Capture Client is its management console. SonicWall Capture Client also has the intelligence to tell you which computer is online, what OS it uses, etc. I also found the rollback feature and SentinelOne integration valuable in SonicWall Capture Client. Rollback is a powerful feature of the solution because it's similar to locking your endpoint during an attack, so you won't have to pay the hackers, particularly during ransomware attacks. That feature in SonicWall Capture Client allows you to get back your endpoint or make your endpoint right again after an attack. I also like that it isn't complex to remove the engine error from the endpoint because you only have to provide the security key from SonicWall Capture Client, so the process is simple. It's not complex."

"SonicWall Capture Client provides dual protection through two multi-engines: SonicWall Capture Client sandboxing and SentinelOne agent, with features like content blocking, real-time 24/7 protection without signature updates, and advanced machine learning that eliminates concerns about manual updates, making it more protective and easier to deploy."

"SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike."

"SonicWall Capture Client's scalability is nice."

"The product’s interface is easy to use."

More SonicWall Capture Client pros

Cons

"The user interface could be improved. It was clunky at times."

"The solution can be improved by adding more features in which the content could be synced."

"Occasionally, the Sentinel engine becomes unresponsive, particularly when customers do not properly restart or shutdown their systems."

"SonicWall Capture Client could be made a little lighter than it currently is in terms of memory consumption."

"An area for improvement in SonicWall Capture Client is TenantCloud support. Suppose you want to implement SonicWall Capture Client. You'll have to register it on MySonicWall. Then once your SonicWall Capture Client license expires and you don't want to renew it, you can't delete it from your MySonicWall account, so that's an area for improvement."

"The implementation is not easy."

"The biggest issue with SonicWall Capture Client is network latency."

"Technical support from SonicWall has room for improvement. While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels."

"SonicWall Capture Client should use less of our PC's memory, as it tends to slow down the performance."

"They should improve their user interface."

More SonicWall Capture Client cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not able to remember the amount, but users have to subscribe for a certain amount, so once they subscribe, the amount gets sent."

"We had a licensing package of $500,000 for three years."

"You have to pay for the solution, and a lot of customers do not want to pay."

"Here in Indonesia, SonicWall Capture Client costs five hundred thousand rupiahs for every endpoint. If I'm correct, you only have to pay the licensing fee, and there's no additional fee. To me, the pricing for SonicWall Capture Client is four out of five."

"The product is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

12%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Capture Client?

SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Capture Client?

It is not similar to other products. For XDR, users have to use another product. XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall. If a user has SonicWall MDR services, then they...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SonicWall Capture Client?

I am a distributor, but I can be counted as a reseller. It does not differ anyway. Most of my clients are SMBs, and I inform them that they should protect their servers with this kind of product, n...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Blackberry Dynamics Apps

Compared 100% of the time

More Blackberry Dynamics Apps Competitors

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Capture Client

Compared 8% of the time

More SonicWall Capture Client Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download Blackberry Dynamics Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

September 2025

Download SonicWall Capture Client product report

Overview

BLACKBERRY DYNAMICS PLATFORM
THE FOUNDATION FOR POWERFUL AND SECURE MOBILE APPS
Built for the most demanding businesses and delivering high availability, disaster recovery and industry-leading scalability, BlackBerry® Dynamics offers an advanced, mature and tested container for mobile apps.

BlackBerry

SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Luton College

Buyer's Guide

Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. SonicWall Capture Client

September 2025

Free Report: Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Find out what your peers are saying about Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. SonicWall Capture Client and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Blackberry Dynamics Apps vs. SonicWall Capture Client report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.