Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Trellix and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while WithSecure is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.5. Trellix holds a 3.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 8,852 Views
  • 6,373 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews
  • 1,405 Views
  • 1,405 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 14, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection both offer strong cybersecurity solutions catering to business needs. Trellix appears to hold a competitive edge in environments needing centralized management capabilities.

Features: Trellix excels in advanced features such as drive encryption, data loss prevention, and firewall integration. It includes Endpoint Detection and Response and seamless third-party app integration. WithSecure Elements emphasizes tamper protection, application safety, and its DeepGuard feature for real-time monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Users of Trellix desire improved manageability, deployment updates, and cloud-native integration; they also report high resource consumption during scans. WithSecure could enhance patch management visibility, lower resource usage, and improve third-party app integration, notably with Microsoft 365.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers flexible deployment options across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments. It generally receives positive feedback on customer support with some response time concerns. WithSecure is commended for its 24/7 support, live chat options, and high customer service ratings, despite occasional compatibility issues.

Pricing and ROI: Pricing for Trellix is seen as higher, reflecting its extensive features and suitability for enterprise with significant ROI potential. WithSecure is deemed cost-effective with straightforward licensing, favored by small to medium businesses for competitive pricing. Both products provide valuable security benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,029 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)
WithSecure Elements Endpoin...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
46th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.9%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection0.8%
Other95.3%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.
Read full review
Mark Feldman - PeerSpot reviewer
Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I recommend Trellix Endpoint Security to others as it seems like one of the industry standards and is fairly stable."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware."
"We really like the dashboard from Trellix and we've found that it's pretty informative."
"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."
"The product can be installed in almost any environment"
"The performance is good."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros
"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."
"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."
"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."
"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."
"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."
"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."
"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."
"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."
 

Cons

"We have had some of our clients not happy with McAfee Endpoint Security because it blocks some of the applications they are trying to use. They should make it easier to unblock applications."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"With McAfee, if there is a zero-day vulnerability, you have to download the patch for it from the McAfee website, then apply it to your endpoint."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"Although they have increased the complexity, it has affected the scanning speed."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons
"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."
"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."
"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."
"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."
"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."
"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."
"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."
"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market."
"The tool is affordable"
"I am happy with the pricing."
"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."
"This product is costly."
"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."
"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."
"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice
"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."
"The product has average pricing."
"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."
"The price is comparable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise59
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
What do you like most about F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The notifications and patch management features are valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?
One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 12% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 7% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 7% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 25% of the time
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Sophos EPP Suite vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 13% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 10% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Compared 9% of the time
More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
October 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
October 2025
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reportDownload WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report
 

Also Known As

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business
 

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.
WithSecure
 

Sample Customers

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
September 2025
Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.