Bizagi vs QualiWare X comparison

"Bizagi is a valuable tool for us to model and automate business processes."

"In the past, we took from 1-3 days for a vacation request for the whole process, and now it's for 2 hours."

"Very user friendly and a professional solution."

"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."

"The tool helps to improve business processes and have better KPIs. Also, it is easy to use. Our developers find it easy to learn."

"The initial setup is super simple."

"Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn."

"With the implementation of Bizagi, approvals have become much more efficient."

"I like the solution's traceability."

"Enterprise architecture and a positive sense of understanding soon reached everyone."

"It is stable and easy to use."

"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."

"We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected."

"It is expensive."

"However, if you are looking at building an application where 100 developers are working in parallel, you will have issues."

"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented."

"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it; they may need an RPA-specific interface."

"I was not so satisfied with arrows in this program."

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

"In the previous version, the web interface was unstable."

"Its price is reasonable."

"We have no issues with the pricing."

"It is expensive."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"This is a free solution."

"The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose."

"I used to be very pleased with the pricing. Now, it's a bit more complicated. I don't remember exactly, however, it might be $10 a month per user."

"When we were working with the on-premises solution, the licenses were a little bit expensive because we had to buy one by one a package of a hundred licenses, whereas now, we are working with the cloud solution, and it has a different cost. It's a different business model because we pay the license for the developers, but the cost is by the environment, and we have unlimited licenses. The business model is different now, but the benefit ratio is good."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."