Bizagi vs CucumberStudio comparison

Bizagi and SmartBear are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Bizagi is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.4, while SmartBear is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.3. Bizagi holds a 2.1% mindshare in RADS, compared to SmartBear’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Bizagi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Bizagi

Read 81 Bizagi reviews

1,590 Views
1,379 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

Read 12 CucumberStudio reviews

77 Views
47 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Bizagi

CucumberStudio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Bizagi and CucumberStudio are competitive products in business process management and collaborative testing environments. Bizagi has the upper hand in process automation, while CucumberStudio is favored for behavior-driven development.

Features: Bizagi includes process modeling, automation, and integration capabilities. CucumberStudio offers collaboration features, a Gherkin editor, and integration with popular testing tools.

Room for Improvement: Bizagi could enhance error identification in integration and improve REST integration and UI design. CucumberStudio may benefit from enhanced test step duplication control, better test coverage metrics, and improved user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi provides cloud-based deployment with strong implementation support. CucumberStudio offers easy deployment with excellent collaborative tools and seamless tool integration.

Pricing and ROI: Bizagi's setup is competitive with high ROI through process efficiency. CucumberStudio requires more initial investment but ensures high ROI with its collaboration features and testing process streamlining.

To learn more, read our detailed Bizagi vs. CucumberStudio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. CucumberStudio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bizagi

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (6th), Business Process Management (BPM) (6th), Process Automation (8th), Low-Code Development Platforms (11th), No-Code Development Platforms (4th), Process Mining (5th)

CucumberStudio

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Bizagi is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CucumberStudio is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

Enables budget review efficiency with open source advantages and workflow orchestration

Definitely, right now, it is purely open source, and we don't have much community support. If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good. Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased. Otherwise, people cannot onboard that particular technology easily.

Read full review

Walter Wirch

Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co.

Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers a free version of their product."

"The initial setup is super simple."

"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."

"In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable."

"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."

"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."

"Very user friendly and a professional solution."

"The most valuable feature is the simulation."

More Bizagi pros

"The solution is stable."

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

Cons

"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."

"The technical support is not fast enough and should be improved."

"Agriculture, Industry."

"From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better."

"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."

"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."

"Cloud support for their process mapping tool could be better. To map all your processes in any way and call your data, you need to download their on-premise setup or their desktop setup. Cloud support for process mapping is limited, and they should work on that."

"It should provide the ability to create a simple application. It can be used for database modeling diagrams and forms, but it should also support CRUD, that is, create, read, update and delete."

More Bizagi cons

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The modeling part of the software is free. Most of the time, it is used for this purpose."

"I think that its price is reasonable."

"For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."

"It is not expensive."

"From what I know of the market, I think Bizagi is a cheap solution for process engineering. Out of the solutions I've tried, from cheapest to most expensive, would be Vizor, Bizagi, Signavio, and then Siemens. I used a version of Bizagi that my university provided for free, so I have never paid for a license."

"The product must improve its cost."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

More Bizagi pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How easy is it to migrate process flow charts (modeled using tools like Visio) into Bizagi?

I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty straightforward to load in files that are BPMN 2.0 compliant. The option to load V...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bizagi?

The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bizagi?

Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it. It was less expensive than some of the other tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about Hiptest?

The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher. Introducing modern technology could improve the platform. API-based solutions are present but could benefit fr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bizagi

Compared 24% of the time

Visio vs Bizagi

Compared 20% of the time

Lucidchart vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Bonita vs Bizagi

Compared 6% of the time

Appian vs Bizagi

Compared 5% of the time

More Bizagi Competitors

TestRail vs CucumberStudio

Compared 100% of the time

More CucumberStudio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi

April 2025

Download Bizagi product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

March 2025

Download CucumberStudio product report

Also Known As

No data available

Hiptest

Overview

Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

Bizagi

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

Buyer's Guide

Bizagi vs. CucumberStudio

April 2025

Free Report: Bizagi vs. CucumberStudio

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi vs. CucumberStudio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bizagi vs. CucumberStudio report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.