Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

Bitdefender and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Bitdefender is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.4, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Bitdefender holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...
Read 27 Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security reviews
  • 2,168 Views
  • 1,624 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Security
Read 144 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews
  • 10,450 Views
  • 8,921 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Security and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security are both leading endpoint security solutions. Bitdefender seems to have the upper hand due to its unmatched features, though Symantec remains strong with a competitive pricing model and robust support.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security is recognized for its advanced threat protection, robust encryption, and responsive support. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security shines with its machine learning, AI-driven detection, and comprehensive threat intelligence. Bitdefender's innovative features, including behavior-based ransomware protection, provide a clear advantage.

Room for Improvement: Symantec's update management, resource consumption, and user interface require enhancements. Bitdefender could improve integration with third-party tools, provide more thorough documentation, and streamline reporting functionalities. Symantec's update issues are more prominent compared to Bitdefender's integration challenges.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec's deployment model is straightforward but its customer service lacks responsiveness. Bitdefender's deployment is more complex yet manageable, with higher-rated customer service providing better support quality. Bitdefender offers a superior deployment and customer service experience.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is more cost-effective in setup, providing a reasonable return on investment. Bitdefender, though pricier, delivers significant ROI through its advanced features, making it a worthwhile investment for those prioritizing cutting-edge security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ent...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
23rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Virtualization Security (3rd)
Symantec Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
144
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.0%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
Admin gets the information about which computer has been infected and good to use for servers and endpoints
The important factor is that after implementing Bitdefender, we haven't found any attacks. It has a vaccine for the RDP protocol, which is specific to this. We do some customization, but it does not lack any protection. Compared to older versions, we have not found any degradation in performance in the newer versions from the last three to five years, whether for graphical or normal users. They're not complaining that we are facing problems like memory issues. Bitdefender is also customizable and granular, but once you install it, it keeps running. The admin gets the information about which computer has been infected and can take action accordingly. On a regular basis, Bitdefender's AI capability is okay. But you cannot leave some decisions to AI. You must have control. You have to look at what you're filtering, as it can be a false positive. But on a regular basis, AI can be helpful.
Read full review
Hakeem_Abdulkareem - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated
Symantec's application security module needs some improvement. You need to create a lot of fingerprints for application security. For instance, let's say I have different brands of ATMs in my environment, like Wincor and NCR. I use GRG to deploy an application control to whitelist some applications. I have to get the exact image of the different models of ATMs. When I tested in the past, some machines would not connect to the server without that. Only the approved software on the ATM should run. Anything outside that should not even come up at all. We did this so that an outside person doesn't introduce malicious software to the ATM. That's the essence of locking down with application control. Using Symantec for application control has been hectic, so I use Carbon Black to do the lockdown. Checking that data security will work fine with Carbon Black. Carbon Black worked fine. Setting up approval in Carbon Black works differently than Symantec. In Symantec, we first need the fingerprints of the applications running underneath. Before setting up Carbon Black, you first install the agent, allowing it to learn the environment. It will analyze all the software's behavior and provide recommendations for what should be allowed. It's more straightforward, whereas configuring application control in Symantec is a bit cumbersome.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Security for malware and threats is the most valuable feature."
"The product offers an opportunity to monitor the things happening in our network. It also has a comprehensive dashboard."
"The domain integrator functionality is particularly noteworthy, allowing me to leverage my existing network infrastructure."
"The installation is easy and it takes approximately a few hours. We are deploying it from a Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) tool. All you need to do is click on it and the installation is complete."
"The cloud console is good and the tool is effective in protection."
"The product provides a single dashboard."
"In terms of threat detection, I would give it a ten out of ten since Bitdefender manages to catch threats that other products miss."
"The most valuable feature is the IDS."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pros
"I find it is the most reliable solution on the market."
"When they started they found it very easy; not easy to implement but easy to use. We started with the headquarters here and later we also implemented it for all the subsidiaries in the region, in other countries. They have a centralized solution, so they can help other countries in management."
"I like the intrusion prevention and Sonar features."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Its ease of use in deploying it and regular updates are most valuable."
"It's a robust product."
"We use the solution for our endpoint security."
"It is a scalable product and is average stability-wise."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"There are compatibility concerns as Bitdefender does not support Windows 7."
"I think it would be helpful if I could get a live console directly on the machine. Additionally, if I could run scripts on the machines to respond to any incidents, that would be a great feature."
"The lack of detecting security threats and high memory usage need to be improved."
"The risk management tool does not have reporting, which I feel to be a huge mistake."
"The price has increased marginally recently and I would prefer if they didn't raise rates."
"I like the Application Control feature, but it's a bit tricky. Managing it can be a bit cumbersome sometimes."
"The solution's stability could be better."
"Overall, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is quite good. It always has new features which customers can use for free, so I can't say that something is missing in the solution, though one area for improvement is that the cloud version of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security still can't connect to a central SIEM. The on-premises version has that capability, but the cloud version doesn't."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security cons
"The whitelisting feature does not work as expected."
"There are a few negative points. They should separate the feature for each separate solution for mobile devices. The second one is about the price, it's expensive. Finally, the third would be the complexity of implementation."
"We communicate with our local partners and they give us the license key. Then, we have to go to the portal and apply it, but sometimes it doesn't work. We then have to create a new administrative account and migrate all our endpoints. That is the only major issue we have been battling with."
"We must have complete dissolution with advance care protection but we are finding out that we need more Symantec technical specialists. We have identified a need to hire at least one more technical specialist familiar with Symantec to improve our solutions capabilities."
"The virus definitions could be updated more frequently."
"Its interface needs improvement. Its interface is very old, and it needs a new look. Other solutions, such as Sophos and BitDefender, have a better and more modern interface, whereas Symantec has had the same interface for a while. There has been no enhancement in the interface. They should update and provide a better interface in 2022 for a better user experience for their customers."
"I know they were just bought out by Broadcom and there have been some difficulties with Broadcom as far as getting license renewals, etc. Mostly, due to the fact that it's confusing, even for the vendor, people are turned off by it. The vendors are telling us that it can take weeks for them to get a renewal quote, nevermind the actual renewal."
"The solution has become quite complicated since Broadcom acquired Symantec, and we no longer sell it or try not to sell it."
More Symantec Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price has gone up since our last renewal. My renewal fee has gone from $517.99 in 2018 for 3 years to $739.99 when it renews this year in July. I love the product, but a price increase of over 40% is a bit exorbitant."
"The tool is not expensive and pricing is competitive."
"The product's pricing is okay and it is yearly."
"In India, licensing is based on annual contracts. It's not extremely expensive, but not the cheapest either. I'd rate it somewhere around seven or eight out of ten."
"The price is fair."
"We purchase the solution for three or five-year intervals. We paid approximately $150 for 10 to 15 users."
"The pricing is reasonable when I compare it to other security solutions, particularly Kaspersky, it stands out. It offers an excellent solution at a more favorable price point."
"We pay for an annual license which is affordable."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice
"Licensing is based on a yearly subscription."
"The price of the solution could be less expensive."
"Pricing and licensing are important to us when choosing a product."
"One great benefit is we do not need to activate a license for every endpoint. The price is fair."
"It is cheap. It is especially cheaper than Malwarebytes, which is three times higher than this. It is also cheaper than Cisco. Its price is almost similar to Bitdefender, Gravity, and CloudZone."
"We pay our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and everything is included in that price."
"Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license."
"When comparing this solution to others in the current market it is expensive."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
It is perfectly stable. We haven't received any complaints from customers regarding stability or performance. It's been smooth sailing so far.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
You don't have to pay extra after buying the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security?
At this point in time, the download footprint is a bit big. What I mean is the initial file I download to deploy on end-user devices is about six hundred to seven hundred megabytes, and it should b...
See all answers
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 14% of the time
Norton Small Business vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Norton Small Business vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 13% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 10% of the time
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 9% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
Compared 8% of the time
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 8% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 7% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
May 2025
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security reportDownload Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments, GravityZone Security for Virtualized Environments
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to protect businesses from advanced threats. It offers a wide range of features, including endpoint protection, network security, and advanced threat intelligence. With its centralized management console, administrators can easily deploy and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

The solution also includes advanced anti-malware and anti-ransomware capabilities, as well as web filtering and application control. Additionally, GravityZone Enterprise Security provides real-time visibility and reporting, allowing organizations to quickly identify and respond to security incidents. 

With its robust security features and user-friendly interface, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is an ideal choice for businesses looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Bitdefender

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module. 

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

SambaSafety, Morefield Communications, Northstar Ltd., Citrix, Greenman-Pedersen
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.