No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Backupify Google Workspace Backup vs Salesforce Backup and Restore comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Backupify Google Workspace ...
Ranking in Cloud Backup
58th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
SaaS Backup (25th)
Salesforce Backup and Restore
Ranking in Cloud Backup
31st
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (29th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Backupify Google Workspace Backup is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Salesforce Backup and Restore is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Salesforce Backup and Restore0.7%
Backupify Google Workspace Backup0.6%
Other98.7%
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

IM
Technical Account Manager / IT Consultant at OnServe - Your IT Department at OnServe
Inexpensive, easy to configure, good support, and it is easy to scale up when needed
The most valuable feature is the interface, which is very nice to work with. Whether you're working on the appliance itself, or you're working on the cloud, it is basically the same interface. It got to the point where when we needed to recover a file, we didn't look at the backup solution anymore. Instead, we went right to the Datto Backupify. Using Backupify took our time to recover from probably four days to 20 minutes. With this device, you're capable of logging into the interface or through an IP address to access the data that is stored on it. Recovery can be just a matter of spinning up a virtual machine or doing a full bare metal recovery, replacing the entire hardware-based server.
DL
Junior Solution Architect at US Department of Transportation (DOT)
Good for data recovery, stable and good documentation
We only use the solution for backup on Salesforce and to manage disaster recovery. I would use it to back up all data, metadata, and information about the organization and to restore it if we have some problems. I use it to try and simulate disaster recovery, but that has not occurred For now,…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
12%
University
9%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Salesforce Backup and Restore?
It was not expensive because my customer chose it, and he didn't want to spend a lot. I don't know the exact price because it's the customer's choice. I just received the username and password to v...
What needs improvement with Salesforce Backup and Restore?
There could be AI-related features to improve backup processes.
What is your primary use case for Salesforce Backup and Restore?
We only use the solution for backup on Salesforce and to manage disaster recovery. I would use it to back up all data, metadata, and information about the organization and to restore it if we have ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Salesforce Backup and Restore powered by odaseva
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Two River Technology Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Commvault and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.