We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can scale the product."
"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."
"The solution has tons of valuable features."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"Among the valuable features of this solution, Application Insights stands out as one of the most significant. It provides insights into application performance and helps identify issues and bottlenecks."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in stability."
"The biggest one is probably just the user interface. There could be more advanced logging at the database level. They can also improve their query builder to allow you to search for things better, but I last used it about a year ago. They might have already changed a ton of things in the newer versions."
"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts."
"I need connectivity with cost management."
"The solution's monitoring feature has limitations for analyzing multiple metrics."
"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with . See our Azure Monitor vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
