No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS IAM Identity Center vs BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (8th)
BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
22nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of AWS IAM Identity Center is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS IAM Identity Center1.9%
BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO0.4%
Other97.7%
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

MO
Web developer at King of CMS Consulting
Centralized access control has improved team collaboration but still needs a simpler onboarding
One of the best features AWS IAM Identity Center offers is the permission set, which is one of the best. Then there are the temporary credentials via SSO, the multi-account governance, and the centralized identity management. Those are good features that I believe assist developers, and another feature I can say is one of the best is the improved security with temporary credentials. The feature I find myself relying on the most day-to-day would be the centralized identity management and multi-account governance. It allows me to check what other developers are doing and since I am the admin, I can also revoke the access they have to the AWS accounts.
reviewer2857998 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems & Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Single sign-on has saved engineering hours but still needs broader security features
I would rate BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO overall a seven out of ten. I chose seven out of ten because it does the job and that is sufficient. If you need more, then it cannot provide that, but it can be improved. Regarding BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO's AI capabilities, I think it does not have any AI and governance security features. The advice I would give to others looking into using BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO is that if you need something basic that does the job and you do not need advanced features, and all you need is single sign-on, then it is for you. My overall review rating for BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO is seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, IAM Identity Center is a great service, currently rated at nine out of ten."
"IAM provides significant benefits when properly deployed."
"The most valuable feature of AWS IAM Identity Center is the ability to provide a structured approach to access management through a single dashboard."
"It has increased the workflow percentage by over 20 to 30%, making it very effective for us to actually achieve the work we're trying to do in a short amount of time."
"The two most valuable features of IAM Identity Center are the security policy generation and automation in creating credentials."
"The most valuable features of AWS IAM Identity Center are role-based permissions and existing permissions templates."
"AWS IAM Identity Center offers a secure and centralized way to manage access and permissions."
"Its valuable features include granular access control, allowing precise control over who can access specific AWS resources and under what conditions using JSON-based policies."
"BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO has impacted my organization positively as it saves a significant amount of engineering hours and effort while securing environments and applications entirely."
 

Cons

"There is a desire to see integration or adoption of time-based user creation features within AWS IAM Identity Center."
"In the product, two groups cannot have the same name...In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names."
"IAM is challenging to manage in complex environments."
"I would like to see more flexibility in the features as sometimes it doesn't meet my expectations."
"The configuration with other tools can be hard."
"The AWS Identity Center's user interface could be improved to provide a clearer understanding of how the system operates."
"I have opened support tickets and received responses, although not always resolving my queries fully. I would appreciate a live chat option with technical support for quicker resolutions."
"Focusing on further allowing customization and flexibility in developing solutions as a solution architect or developer would enhance user experience."
"BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO can be improved as competitors have more to offer."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cheap since it is available on the cloud."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?
AWS provides the lowest pricing among other service providers like Azure, Google, Oracle. It is cost-effective, and they use a pay-as-you-go model.
What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?
I think AWS IAM Identity Center can be improved by making it beginner-friendly. It was very hard for me to navigate initially because the UI was very complicated. I had to do a lot of research and ...
What is your primary use case for AWS IAM Identity Center?
My main use case for AWS IAM Identity Center is hosting and redirecting web services that I want to use as localhost, but then I have to reroute it. What I did was create a permission set and use i...
What needs improvement with BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO?
BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO can be improved as competitors have more to offer. For example, in the device trust section or other areas, BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO needs to develop additional tools beyond sing...
What is your primary use case for BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO?
My main use case for BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO is for single sign-on applications in enterprise environments. We have in-house application developers who use it for integration with SaaS and APIs. A sp...
What advice do you have for others considering BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO?
I would rate BoxyHQ Enterprise SSO overall a seven out of ten. I chose seven out of ten because it does the job and that is sufficient. If you need more, then it cannot provide that, but it can be ...
 

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
1. Atlassian2. Baidu 3. Cisco 4. Dell 5. Google 6. IBM 7. Intel 8. LinkedIn 9. Microsoft 10. Oracle 11. Salesforce 12. SAP 13. ServiceNow 14. Siemens 15. Spotify 16. Tata Consultancy Services 17. Toyota 18. Twitter 19. Uber 20. Visa 21. Walt Disney 22. WeWork 23. World Bank 24. Xerox 25. Zynga
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: August 2026.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.