AWS Cost Management [EOL] vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. Additionally, 83% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Read 10 AWS Cost Management [EOL] reviews

83% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 14 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

4,626 Views
2,914 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AWS Cost Management [EOL]

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Cost Management [EOL] and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, IBM, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (19th), Cloud Cost Management (8th)

Featured Reviews

RANJAN KUMAR

DevOps Engineer at ZoomOps Technology

Helps to set cost thresholds and receive alerts if the actual cost exceeds them

We regularly check the status of services to identify any unnecessary or unexpected costs. We utilize the billing dashboard in AWS to monitor daily costs and assess any significant increases. For instance, if our daily AWS expenses usually amount to $1,000 for running a hundred instances, and suddenly it spikes to $1,500, we investigate the reasons behind the increase. We scrutinize detailed reports, identify the areas and services contributing to the rise, and inform our manager. The dashboard overview in AWS Cost Explorer provides a high-level summary of our expenses, covering databases. This includes total costs, daily costs, and a breakdown by services. AWS Cost Explorer offers visualization tools like line charts, bar charts, and pie charts. These visualizations assist us in quickly understanding expenditures, enabling us to pinpoint areas that might need attention. The tool allows the creation of custom reports by selecting and configuring filtering and grouping options. Custom reports include a data range selector, making it easy to analyze expenses for specific periods such as daily, monthly, or custom durations. The budget feature is client-dependent. Before creating any services, we engage with our client to understand their requirements, such as the number of instances, CPU, and memory needed. Subsequently, we create a budgeting tool in servers based on these specifications. Our team configures custom notifications to alert us when actual costs or usage exceed predefined thresholds. These alerts can be sent via email or integrated with Simple Notification Service. I rate the overall product a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Sasikiran Sakalabattina

V Mware And Vector Administration at Tech Mahindra Limited

Centralized dashboards have optimized multi-cloud costs and improved financial governance

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a powerful cloud management platform, but there are areas for improvement. I would prefer to see more AI-driven insights that not only recommend optimization but also suggest automated remediation actions. Real-time cost synchronization could be faster, as billing data sometimes has delays. More customized dashboards and report templates would help teams tailor their needs better. Kubernetes cost visibility could be more granular for centralized workloads. Integration with ITSM and automation tools such as ServiceNow and Ansible could be enhanced. Simplifying initial onboarding and policy configuration would also improve the experience for new users. These enhancements would make the platform even more efficient for enterprise cloud operations. This tool is a mature and relevant cloud management platform with several areas that could be enhanced. I would prefer to see more advanced AI capabilities providing predictive insights and automated remediation for common optimization tasks. Better, faster synchronization of cloud billing and utilization data would enable near real-time cost monitoring. I want more customizable dashboards and executive reports tailored for different stakeholders such as FinOps, infrastructure, and management teams. Improving Kubernetes container cost visibility at the pod level is also necessary. I would prefer to see stronger AI-driven automation, faster real-time cost updates, more customizable dashboards, deeper Kubernetes cost visibility, enhanced DevOps integrations, and a simpler onboarding process as areas needing improvement. These enhancements would further increase operational efficiency and make the platform more valuable for enterprise cloud management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Cost Management is good for providing in-depth information in one place."

"The budgeting tool of AWS Cost Management is the most valuable feature."

"Technical support for AWS is perfect."

"With the cost management tool, clients can optimize fine tuning their consumption, and optimize what they spend for these services."

"The initial setup wasn't complex at all."

"All of the reporting features are very good, as they allow us to track monthly expenses and send relevant emails."

"The tool's cost management feature provides a comprehensive view of AWS costs, allowing us to plan and make cost-effective decisions. With AWS Cost Explorer, we can perform cost planning, generate recommendations, and provide clients with suggestions for resizing. This feature includes data filtering and protection, offering users insights into spending patterns through AWS spending patterns and planning tools. The product is easy to learn."

"I like the recommendation we get from AWS Cost Management to use a particular image or VM type."

More AWS Cost Management [EOL] pros

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has helped me achieve twenty to thirty percent cloud cost optimization and save thirty to forty percent of the time."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers."

"With this, we have right-sized many instances, removed many unused EBS volumes, and unused Elastic IPs, and in that way, we have cut around 20% of cost."

"Customers do utilize a security and compliance framework with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth because larger institutions won't move forward without it, and they choose VMware to ensure a tested and foolproof secure environment that complies with regulatory standards such as VMware Cloud Foundation with its trust policies, making it quite good."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has positively impacted my organization by optimizing cloud costs and helping platform teams make data-driven decisions while ensuring compliance."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"AWS Cost Management has fewer features compared to Azure Cost Management."

"The solution needs to have its own dashboard for seeing details on it. It should be customizable as well so I have the ability to pull up the information I need to see and have it in one place for my reference. I should just be able to click and see everything I need in one step."

"I would like to see the forecasting models improved with AWS Cost Management."

"One area where AWS could improve is in the compatibility with other products like Cloud AD has."

"The cost management portion of the solution should be improved."

"The solution needs to improve the communication mechanism available to the stakeholders."

"This program is not very scalable."

"I would like to see AWS Cost Management be more precise in their calculations."

More AWS Cost Management [EOL] cons

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"The Perspectives feature could be better. I would like to have more automation and flexibility to put in data and react to a certain event."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth can improve by introducing real-time cost visibility and alerting so that we can better act on that."

"Real-time cost synchronization could be faster, as billing data sometimes has delays."

"When you start to virtualize things it gets very expensive."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Cost Management is free to use."

"The product is affordable."

"The tool's pricing depends on our services."

"We get AWS Cost Management for free because we use AWS services."

"We have signed a long-term contract with AWS. There are different service levels that will determine the level of support you have."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudHealth?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is that the setup is minimal and simple. I have not been directly responsible for pricing setup in CloudHealth, bu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

The weak points of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are that while the product is quite capable, cost can be an issue at times. The learning curve is steep because people like to take their own time to und...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is used primarily to provide users with a seamless working environment without losing connectivity by offering a solution that virtualizes their computing environment. It i...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio Cloudability vs AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Densify vs AWS Cost Management [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS Cost Management [EOL] Competitors

Apptio Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 7% of the time

CloudCheckr vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 4% of the time

CloudBolt vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 3% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Cost Management [EOL]

August 2026

Download AWS Cost Management [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

July 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

Amazon Cost Management

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

AWS Cost Management tools give you visibility into your AWS costs and usage. There are a range of AWS Cost Management tools to help you access, organize, understand, control, and optimize your costs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides an intuitive dashboard, pricing flexibility, and accountability features, helping users allocate cloud costs, enhance security, and optimize expenses for improved cloud management.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out for its comprehensive cloud cost allocation by team, ensuring expense optimization and increased security. Its compliance management, scalability, and competitive pricing offer significant advantages. The platform facilitates monitoring across multi-cloud environments and delivers cost-saving recommendations. Transparent reporting and robust support enhance agility and aid in effective issue resolution.

What are the key features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Intuitive Dashboard: Simplifies cloud management with user-friendly interfaces.
Pricing Flexibility: Offers adaptable pricing models to suit diverse needs.
Accountability Features: Supports team-based cost allocation and tracking.
Compliance Management: Ensures security standards are consistently met.
Scalability: Supports elastic growth and resource management across environments.
Performance Optimization: Provides tools to optimize cloud performance and reduce waste.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Cost Savings: Identifies opportunities to optimize cloud spending.
Improved Security: Enhances cloud security protocols and monitoring.
Transparent Reporting: Delivers clear and detailed usage and cost reports.
Efficient Issue Resolution: Streamlines processes for swift problem-solving.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is extensively implemented for cloud expenditure management in multi-cloud landscapes, aiding sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail in leveraging dashboards for enhanced transparency and financial control. Users rely on the platform for monitoring health conditions, reporting costs, optimizing spending, and driving accountability through detailed analytics and insights.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Cost Management

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, IBM, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.