We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
Earn 20 points
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and GoCD, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and JFrog Pipeline.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.