Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodePipeline vs Harness comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodePipeline optimizes development efficiency and resources, enhancing monitoring with expected financial returns similar to AWS Batch.
Sentiment score
9.1
Harness enhances deployment efficiency, reducing release times, improving processes, and decreasing failures, saving up to 40% development time.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
Technical Associate at ZS
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
Software Engineer at Citi
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
AWS CodePipeline support receives mixed reviews, with faster assistance in business plans; documentation helps some manage independently.
Sentiment score
7.3
Organizations rely on internal teams for incidents with Harness, benefiting from efficient communication and minimal external support needs.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators
We have been receiving incident reports whenever an incident occurs on Harness, and they are usually quick to respond.
Technical Associate at ZS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodePipeline is scalable and flexible, efficiently managing deployments across languages with high user satisfaction, despite Linux limitations.
Sentiment score
7.4
Harness is scalable for large enterprises, though stability issues may arise with integrations exceeding 20 applications.
AWS CodePipeline is good for scalability, and I rate it as nine out of ten.
Head of Development at Abyss
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
Technical Associate at ZS
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
Software Engineer at Citi
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
AWS CodePipeline is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues if correctly configured, aligning well with CI/CD expectations.
Sentiment score
7.0
Harness is stable with prompt support, though integration of multiple applications may reduce stability, and occasional downtime occurs.
I rate the stability of AWS CodePipeline as a ten out of ten because I have not experienced any issues with it.
Head of Development at Abyss
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators
Harness is decently stable.
Technical Associate at ZS
 

Room For Improvement

AWS CodePipeline users want lower costs, faster builds, enhanced multi-cloud support, better integrations, UI, customization, and improved technical documentation.
Harness should streamline setup, enhance security and stability, simplify configurations, and revamp the UI to outperform competitors.
The documentation for AWS CodePipeline is lacking and makes it difficult to find information due to its complexity.
Head of Development at Abyss
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Technical Associate at ZS
When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful.
Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find AWS CodePipeline cost-effective and flexible, with monthly costs typically under $5 per pipeline.
I estimated it costs around $5 monthly.
Head of Development at Abyss
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
Technical Associate at ZS
 

Valuable Features

AWS CodePipeline excels in integration, flexibility, cost-efficiency, security, and simplifies transitions with robust deployment and management tools.
Harness simplifies code deployment with automation, visual tools, AI error detection, and secure, downtime-free deployment methods.
It allows me to test changes in an isolated environment before deploying them to the entire user base.
Head of Development at Abyss
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The main feature is that it asks for approval before proceeding ahead.
Senior AWS Consultant at Quantum Integrators
One of the best features Harness offers is the ability to templatize pipelines.
Technical Associate at ZS
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline
Ranking in Build Automation
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Harness
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (17th), Cloud Cost Management (8th), Feature Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 3.4%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Harness is 6.2%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
AWS CodePipeline3.4%
Harness6.2%
Other90.4%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

JR
Head of Development at Abyss
Employs advanced deployment strategies and manages CI/CD workflow efficiently
Blue-green deployment has been incredibly beneficial for handling complex deployments in AWS CodePipeline. It allows me to test changes in an isolated environment before deploying them to the entire user base. Additionally, the CI/CD support provided by AWS simplifies the integration process by adding YAML files to projects, enabling AWS to manage the entire CI/CD workflow.
MK
Technical Associate at ZS
Templatized pipelines have improved efficiency while limitations in code-based development remain
Harness UI can do a lot of good things. Harness's UI should not feel very complicated. At the current stage, it feels very commercialized and compared to other platforms such as Argo CD or Jenkins, which feel much more lively and much more simple. Infrastructure as code or pipeline as code is something that Harness severely lacks. There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code. Pipeline as code is definitely one of the disadvantages when it comes to Harness. Additionally, the entire platform feels very commercialized, which is something that a lot of developers, especially open-source enthusiasts, might not appreciate even within the organization. One of the very important key factors I observed was that there is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines. There is no way to execute nested pipeline execution, which may or may not be required based on the use case, but it is definitely one of those features that I wish the platform had.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?
Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?
AWS CodePipeline's pricing is reasonable, and it is not too expensive. I estimated it costs around $5 monthly. On a scale from one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I would...
What do you like most about Harness?
It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.
What needs improvement with Harness?
Harness UI can do a lot of good things. Harness's UI should not feel very complicated. At the current stage, it feels very commercialized and compared to other platforms such as Argo CD or Jenkins,...
What is your primary use case for Harness?
Harness has been implemented in our organization for one of our clients for approximately 8 to 10 months. Harness is particularly utilized for our infrastructure provisioning pipelines and our RITM...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

CodePipeline
Armory
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. Harness and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.