We performed a comparison between AWS Backup and NetApp SaaS Backup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veeam Software, N-able and others in SaaS Backup."The advantage that AWS Backup has over competitors is that it's very simple."
"It provides an easy data migration process from on-premise to cloud."
"When I was using an on-premises backup, there was an external hard drive or something like that. I had a backup server, but I had a few problems related to transfer when I had to restore something that I have deleted. I had to wait for after-office hours to do something like that, but now I just have to send a mail. Within one hour, I have my restored file."
"It's very easy to configure. Since it's a managed service, it's very straightforward to set up and use. And my customers get on with it very fast."
"It also saves costs and is quick."
"It works well as a backup and as a service."
"The solution has an effective overwrite feature."
"The solution's most valuable features are its backup capability and tight integration with other AWS services."
"It's a user-friendly solution."
"It gives you an option to back up to the cloud or back up to on-premise, or to backup to cloud storage."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The most valuable features are the support for both NAS and NFS."
"The most valuable feature is the simplicity in configuration and use."
"AWS Backup could improve because you cannot use Glacier or anything but EFS."
"To create a plan and for all the configuration, one has to do multiple steps, which could be organized in a much simpler way, making the user experience better."
"They should work on their visual capabilities."
"The notifications on the backup and on the mobile app could be more useful. If they could arrange notes or notifications properly and offer services for managing it in our region, it would be helpful for us."
"The service disconnects a lot."
"If AWS Backup were a hybrid solution that also supported on-premises backups then it would be very helpful, especially if you are doing a migration to the cloud."
"There are some limitations to partial backup in AWS Backup."
"Its cost could be better than a few of its competitors."
"The features need to be updated to support the latest hardware, as it changes every year."
"For newcomers or people who have less experience, it's a complex solution that could be simplified somewhat."
"I would like to see the graphical user interface improved to include all of the functionality because there are some things that you need to use the command-line interface for."
"Better integration with third-party databases and applications is needed."
"There are still a few things on SharePoint that they need to correct in terms of how they backup and restore."
Earn 20 points
AWS Backup is ranked 5th in SaaS Backup with 21 reviews while NetApp SaaS Backup is ranked 24th in SaaS Backup. AWS Backup is rated 8.0, while NetApp SaaS Backup is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AWS Backup writes "Useful point-in-time recovery, highly scalable, and implementation straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SaaS Backup writes "User-friendly, superb customization, and the security is good". AWS Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, Rubrik Go and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, whereas NetApp SaaS Backup is most compared with .
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
