No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AVEVA Avantis.PRO vs Hexagon EAM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AVEVA Avantis.PRO
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hexagon EAM
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
6th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of AVEVA Avantis.PRO is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hexagon EAM is 3.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hexagon EAM3.1%
AVEVA Avantis.PRO1.7%
Other95.2%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use AVEVA Avantis.PRO?
Leave a review
SS
Application Engineer at Ernst & Young
Workflow customization has streamlined maintenance tracking but still needs deeper flexibility
The best features Hexagon EAM offers, in my experience, are the status customizations, which are easier from an end-user perspective. Users can simply go to status authorization to make changes. The status custom license feature makes things easier for end users in that if a supervisor needs access to change a work order into cancel status, they can simply go to status auth, give the status auth user role, and then select the entity they want to do it for, such as purchase order. They select purchase order and fill in the from status to status and then save it. Once they log in to Hexagon EAM, these new statuses are reflected. Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization. It was our first project, and after go-live, it resulted in huge success. The client was satisfied and thrilled, and we received positive feedback. Specific outcomes from that success include cost reductions around 30%, labor utilization increased by 20%, and new users are adopting the systems and appreciate the product and are eager to work in those systems.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Hexagon EAM?
Hexagon EAM can be improved, especially in workflows. If I observe other applications, I can customize the workflow as part of not only the out-of-box features, allowing for proper customization of...
What is your primary use case for Hexagon EAM?
My main use case for Hexagon EAM is that I was a developer at Hexagon, and I perform customizations as part of client requirements. A specific example of a customization I have worked on using Hexa...
What advice do you have for others considering Hexagon EAM?
The advice I would give to others looking into using Hexagon EAM is to be careful while writing Flexes. Since Flexes are based on PL/SQL, if I mess up with any PL/SQL, I cannot save any records, so...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Schneider Electric, Arizona Public Service, BP
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Infor, IFS and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: May 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.