No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hexagon EAM vs IFS Cloud Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hexagon EAM
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IFS Cloud Platform
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
CRM (28th), Customer Experience Management (11th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (16th), ERP (20th), Activity Based Costing Software (10th), Local Government CRM (13th), IT Asset Management (13th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (15th), License Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of Hexagon EAM is 2.9%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 6.5%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hexagon EAM2.9%
IFS Cloud Platform6.5%
Other90.6%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

SA
Senior product manager at Metrolinx
Digital workflows have transformed fleet maintenance and now need faster UI and smarter automation
Hexagon EAM can be improved by incorporating artificial intelligence features, predictive maintenance features, and inventory management improvements. They can also explore adding more features beneficial for daily operations. Hexagon EAM could also extend into different sectors like oil and engineering fields, which they are already doing. The EAM application will help save money through predictive maintenance activities, leading to higher efficiency of the equipment. I want to highlight that whenever we have hundreds of checklist items on a specific route, which has hundreds of equipment, processing these work orders takes a lot of time. The status changes are time-consuming because these work orders have hundreds of equipment attached to them and numerous checklist items. When we save the work order, it takes a long time. If Hexagon can improve the speed of the application, whether in the on-premise or cloud versions, by optimizing the user interface response times, it would be very helpful for us. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would give Hexagon EAM a 7. I chose 7 out of 10 because there are still many improvements needed on the EAM application regarding performance and the addition of predictive maintenance and artificial intelligence features. There is significant scope for improvement in application performance, which justifies my score of 7 out of 10.
reviewer2268153 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Operations Engineer
Integrated planning has improved production scheduling and now reduces downtime and costs
The biggest friction point I have run into with IFS Cloud Platform is user adoption, which has been the biggest challenge, as different users in the organization need to get accustomed to the new processes after years of using spreadsheets and legacy systems, requiring training and a mindset shift, along with challenging data migration and process standardization. My advice to someone considering IFS Cloud Platform with a similar workflow is to spend sufficient time understanding and standardizing their business processes before implementing it, as the technology is very powerful, but the real value comes when processes, data, and teams are all aligned. I would rate my overall experience with IFS Cloud Platform as a 9 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization by significantly lowering costs."
"I find every feature of Hexagon EAM to be the best for me because it decreases time and minimizes paper usage, including the energy management system that integrates with other flow meters allowing all data to be viewed on a single screen."
"Hexagon EAM's traceability is impressive, making it easy to maintain historical data, perform root cause analysis, and complete fishbone diagram reporting."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted my organization by reducing the downtime of the assets."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization; it was our first project, and after go-live, it resulted in huge success, with the client satisfied and thrilled, cost reductions around 30%, labor utilization increased by 20%, and new users adopting the systems, appreciating the product, and eager to work in those systems."
"What I appreciate the most about Hexagon EAM are its robust features."
"Hexagon EAM helps the business maintain the buses by daily reading their mileage and managing asset life cycle maintenance."
"My advice to others who are considering implementing Hexagon EAM is to implement it, that it is a good product, that it is a product totally adaptable to each of the clients' needs, that it has a lot of potential to grow if they finally want to get the most out of it."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users."
"Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services."
"IFS Applications is based on industry standards that are using a multi-tier deployment model, making it much easier to integrate IFS Applications with other enterprise software packages, while its modern, easy-to-learn user interface offers many features for filtering, searching, and navigating."
"What I like about IFS Applications is that it's easier to use and implement than SAP. I also like that the IFS Applications team is more flexible than the SAP team."
"The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software."
"The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products."
"Pricing Matrix: Allowed us to implement a very complex go to market pricing model, allowing us to tailor pricing to individual customer requirements and implement an automated pricing model that maximized gross profit in a very competitive environment."
"We applied the ISO 20000 standard using Assyst."
 

Cons

"Hexagon EAM can be improved by rebranding from HxGN EAM to APM, Asset Performance Management."
"Customers have noted that engaging with the Hexagon technical support team can be a lengthy process, especially with the on-premises version, where sharing logs and receiving resolutions is time-consuming."
"I want to highlight that whenever we have hundreds of checklist items on a specific route, which has hundreds of equipment, processing these work orders takes a lot of time."
"I think Hexagon EAM could be improved by having new functions and more accessibility for different generations of users."
"It excels at work management, with the majority of its functionalities focused there, but it lacks in the inventory module."
"Adding more columns to existing objects is very hard, and I need to create custom tables and link them to the existing tables, which makes coding very challenging."
"The stability of Hexagon EAM has been good, although it can be a bit slow when handling a lot of data."
"One thing most users complain about is the speed; I do not think it is an application issue but more about maintaining the database."
"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."
"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."
"I'm a business analyst, so I do a lot of customer-facing work. I take calls from businesses I have to troubleshoot. One thing that bugs me is the error messages you get from IFS. If I get an error message, I have to dig to find the cause because, often, the error message doesn't precisely describe the problem. It'll hint about where the problem lies, but you have to work to find the root cause. It doesn't help in my situation. You expect an error message to point to the field or what is causing the issue."
"The customer service is not good as expected but we can say its fair."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great."
"There are some stability issues."
"We have upgraded to the latest version right now. We have issues with the quality. We tried to enroll in their Evergreen program which was meant to help us adopt any service update or anything that the tool’s providers come up with."
"Technical support could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is reasonably priced."
"Compared to SAP, the pricing for IFS Applications was very affordable. People using the solution would find that it's worth the money."
"There's an additional yearly cost for support."
"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."
"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."
"I consider it to be a well-priced solution compared to other mid-range or high-end ERP solutions."
"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."
"It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
8%
Construction Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hexagon EAM?
I would add that one of the features of Hexagon EAM that could be improved is the lack of vendor-side integration or a module for vendors. In most cases I have encountered where Hexagon EAM is used...
What is your primary use case for Hexagon EAM?
My main use cases for Hexagon EAM are asset maintenance and inventory management, which are primarily used in automotive manufacturing and the pharmaceuticals industry. I can provide a specific exa...
What advice do you have for others considering Hexagon EAM?
On the integration side, I have not used DataBridge Pro, but I believe it is a good step towards integration with other applications. Reporting through Cognos Report Studio is good and offers most ...
What needs improvement with IFS Applications?
There are features that came up during implementation that we are not actually using today, such as field service management (FSM), because we do not have any field technicians visiting customer si...
What is your primary use case for IFS Applications?
My main use case for IFS Cloud Platform is for production planning, where I typically use it for production scheduling and for inventory management. When I open IFS Cloud Platform, the first thing ...
What advice do you have for others considering IFS Applications?
The biggest friction point I have run into with IFS Cloud Platform is user adoption, which has been the biggest challenge, as different users in the organization need to get accustomed to the new p...
 

Also Known As

No data available
IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia. 
Find out what your peers are saying about Hexagon EAM vs. IFS Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.