No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hexagon EAM vs Oracle Enterprise Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hexagon EAM
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Enterprise Asset Man...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
5th
Average Rating
5.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of Hexagon EAM is 2.9%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is 6.5%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hexagon EAM2.9%
Oracle Enterprise Asset Management6.5%
Other90.6%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Featured Reviews

SA
Senior product manager at Metrolinx
Digital workflows have transformed fleet maintenance and now need faster UI and smarter automation
Hexagon EAM can be improved by incorporating artificial intelligence features, predictive maintenance features, and inventory management improvements. They can also explore adding more features beneficial for daily operations. Hexagon EAM could also extend into different sectors like oil and engineering fields, which they are already doing. The EAM application will help save money through predictive maintenance activities, leading to higher efficiency of the equipment. I want to highlight that whenever we have hundreds of checklist items on a specific route, which has hundreds of equipment, processing these work orders takes a lot of time. The status changes are time-consuming because these work orders have hundreds of equipment attached to them and numerous checklist items. When we save the work order, it takes a long time. If Hexagon can improve the speed of the application, whether in the on-premise or cloud versions, by optimizing the user interface response times, it would be very helpful for us. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would give Hexagon EAM a 7. I chose 7 out of 10 because there are still many improvements needed on the EAM application regarding performance and the addition of predictive maintenance and artificial intelligence features. There is significant scope for improvement in application performance, which justifies my score of 7 out of 10.
Nadun Gamage - PeerSpot reviewer
Controller Software Applications support at SAUDI CEMENT
The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable
I rate the ease of initial setup a five out of ten. It's not so difficult to set up and configure the product, but it is not entirely easy. We need a set of experienced people to deploy the solution. However, people with experience in Oracle are not difficult to find.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted our organization by significantly lowering costs."
"Hexagon EAM helps the business maintain the buses by daily reading their mileage and managing asset life cycle maintenance."
"Hexagon EAM has had a positive impact on my organization by modernizing our software and management status."
"It does save us money because we are able to keep track of all the data that is related to equipment and repairing equipment, and the data that we are able to put in when we purchase equipment allows us to see exactly how much we have been spending on a piece of equipment since its purchase, helping us make educated decisions on whether a certain piece of equipment is at the end of its life cycle or not."
"Hexagon EAM has positively impacted my organization by helping and solving problems in the work order workflow and approval in real-time."
"My advice to others who are considering implementing Hexagon EAM is to implement it, that it is a good product, that it is a product totally adaptable to each of the clients' needs, that it has a lot of potential to grow if they finally want to get the most out of it."
"What I appreciate the most about Hexagon EAM are its robust features."
"By saving time for technicians, we complete work that typically takes 8 hours in just 4 hours, resulting in saving 50% of time and reducing labor costs as a result."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
 

Cons

"I think Hexagon EAM could be improved by having new functions and more accessibility for different generations of users."
"Adding more columns to existing objects is very hard, and I need to create custom tables and link them to the existing tables, which makes coding very challenging."
"One thing most users complain about is the speed; I do not think it is an application issue but more about maintaining the database."
"It excels at work management, with the majority of its functionalities focused there, but it lacks in the inventory module."
"I want to highlight that whenever we have hundreds of checklist items on a specific route, which has hundreds of equipment, processing these work orders takes a lot of time."
"I do wish there were more updates and enhancements."
"Customers have noted that engaging with the Hexagon technical support team can be a lengthy process, especially with the on-premises version, where sharing logs and receiving resolutions is time-consuming."
"The stability of Hexagon EAM has been good, although it can be a bit slow when handling a lot of data."
"The product is not user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions are best for your needs.
908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hexagon EAM?
I would add that one of the features of Hexagon EAM that could be improved is the lack of vendor-side integration or a module for vendors. In most cases I have encountered where Hexagon EAM is used...
What is your primary use case for Hexagon EAM?
My main use cases for Hexagon EAM are asset maintenance and inventory management, which are primarily used in automotive manufacturing and the pharmaceuticals industry. I can provide a specific exa...
What advice do you have for others considering Hexagon EAM?
On the integration side, I have not used DataBridge Pro, but I believe it is a good step towards integration with other applications. Reporting through Cognos Report Studio is good and offers most ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
averda, Eaton Corp., Hover Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Kalpataru Ltd, SITA, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., Yarra Valley Water, KEC International Ltd., eVerge Group, Cerner Corp., Standard Life, Company RS a.d. Banja Luka (Telekomunikacije RS a.d., Banja Luka Telecommunications
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Hexagon AB, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: July 2026.
908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.