We performed a comparison between Avature and isolved based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management.
Being able to hire on-demand for a specific job can be a life saver for many organizations, which is why hiring contingent workers is on the rise. But most companies have failed to implement a freelance management system that allows them to truly see the full picture of their hiring.
The consequences? Higher hiring costs, lost time on inefficient sourcing efforts and missed opportunities for keeping top talent engaged.
So, how can organizations avoid this? By adopting a new approach to contingent workforce management. A flexible workforce management software can grant them the visibility they need over all their contingent talent and the necessary data to adjust their strategies.
HCM systems like isolved support a wide range of HR functions and offer a centralized place to manage recruitment, payroll, benefits administration, time keeping, and more. Companies that invest in a HCM platform will see increased efficiency and performance improvements.
Avature is ranked 42nd in Talent Management while isolved is ranked 49th in Talent Management. Avature is rated 0.0, while isolved is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Avature is most compared with phenom people TRM Platform and Workday, whereas isolved is most compared with ADP Workforce Now, Gusto and Paylocity.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.