We performed a comparison between Avantra and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SAP Service Providers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can customize alerts based on need."
"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"I am satisfied with the support."
"Visualizations helped the organisation with a better understanding of its KPIs."
"It allows the centralization of data and makes possible new sorts of correlations that were previously impossible using traditional SIEMs such as ArcSight or QRadar."
"There are a lot of third-party applications that can be installed."
"Compared to IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security offers faster alert resolution."
"The connections to the database are very good and updating the data files is simple to do. The dashboards are useful and user-friendly."
"The solution helped reduce our alert volume."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is website activity monitoring."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"An area of improvement would be the licensing of the solution. They need a free license, which would allow faster lead times."
"Splunk does not build apps. They only go back and validate the apps that somebody has already built. They should have remote consulting support. They have a wonderful solution. They have 24/7 security. Nobody needs to depend on any third party and will therefore just buy Splunk on the cloud."
"There are limitations with Splunk not detecting all user activity, especially on mainframes and network devices."
"There are new services which are coming up. If Splunk can catch up with the speed of Amazon, and with the integration, instead of us waiting for another year or so, that would be good."
"There are a lot of competitive products that are doing better than what Splunk is doing on the analytics side."
"The security can be improved."
"It needs integration with a configuration management solution."
"We'd like Splunk to reduce false positives."
Avantra is ranked 4th in SAP Service Providers with 5 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. Avantra is rated 8.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Avantra is most compared with Datadog, AppDynamics, Dynatrace and OpsRamp, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Avantra vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
We monitor all SAP Service Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
