We performed a comparison between Atlassian Crowd and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."
"One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."
"It is flexible and easy to install."
"They have good push authentications."
"Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components."
"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."
"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."
"The training is too costly."
"They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."
"It can have more API integrations."
"It's not compatible with on-premises installations, unless you host it as a SaaS. We were not able to do that. For example, imagine a scenario where the cloud is not available. Then, Okta will not work for you. That use case will readily fail because it doesn't have an on-premises installation that you can use to authenticate or provide identity and access management. If you have a purely on-premises solution that is not connected to the internet, then this will not work. This is one area that can be improved."
"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."
Atlassian Crowd is ranked 14th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews. Atlassian Crowd is rated 9.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian Crowd writes "Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Atlassian Crowd is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Atlassian Crowd vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.