We performed a comparison between Aruba Instant and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a redundant wireless connection for a client."
"When users want to migrate from one location to another, they face no problems with connectivity."
"You can handle all of the access points at once virtually instead of manually handling each one. You're able to populate all of the information to all of the access points through the virtual controller as well. It transforms everything it a single access point, which simplifies things."
"The most valuable feature of this product is that it is easily deployed."
"The product is easy to configure."
"The coverage of the solution is great."
"The solution is stable, and we are satisfied."
"Works automatically in terms of setup with the product finding its master wifi access point."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The solution is very stable."
"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."
"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."
"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The price could be better."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"It is good as it is. If anything, its reporting could be improved."
"The product’s GUI must be improved."
"The tool's support quality has changed since HPE acquired it. It is also impossible to tell the log dates."
"The solution should be able to support more users on the access points."
"It uses a different portal and has limitations from the customer side as it's not refined for MSP."
"The Central cloud management (optional) is far behind the competition in features, ease of use, and dependability. I have tried Aruba Central a few times over the years and, in my option, it is not where it needs to be for serious consideration in production environments."
"The only issue we've had is getting equipment supplies. The availability of the APs that I want to use has been an issue. It took almost two months to get them the first time. I've ordered a few more for another client, and they're still on back order. It has been over a month now."
"There was only ever one case in which an access point failed, but it was reintegrated. The issue was more of a matter of oversight. One part of the network had covered ten access points."
"The setup was complex."
"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."
"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"Compared to other OEMs, Mojo Networks or Arista faces a little bit of coverage issues. So, if we put the same dBm, the power of the other OEMs indicates much more extensive coverage compared to Mojo or Arista."
"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Instant is ranked 6th in Wireless LAN with 42 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Aruba Instant is rated 8.6, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Instant writes "A highly stable and easy-to-deploy solution that is free and provides excellent deployment guides". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Aruba Instant is most compared with Omada Access Points, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cisco Wireless. See our Aruba Instant vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
