Arista NDR vs Trend Vision One comparison

Arista and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Arista is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trend Micro is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Arista holds a 3.5% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Trend Micro’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

Arista NDR

Read 14 Arista NDR reviews

2,140 Views
1,541 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trend Vision One

Read 95 Trend Vision One reviews

14,085 Views
1,127 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Arista NDR

Trend Vision One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Arista NDR and Trend Vision One compete in the network detection and response category. Arista NDR appears to have the upper hand with its focused network analysis capabilities that offer detailed insights and anomaly detection.

Features: Arista NDR provides detailed network visibility, real-time traffic analysis, and a Security Knowledge Graph for visual insights. Its strength lies in anomaly detection using behavior-based machine learning. Trend Vision One offers comprehensive security across endpoints and networks, centralized management, and third-party tool integration, enhancing end-to-end threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Arista NDR can enhance its query language for new users and encrypted traffic analysis. Improving third-party tool integration would broaden its security architecture support. Trend Vision One could benefit from improved search functionality, a more intuitive user interface, and enhanced SOAR capabilities. Simplifying its complex features could increase user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arista NDR typically deploys on-premises, providing extensive on-site control suited for enterprises preferring localized data management. Its customer service is praised for responsiveness and swift resolutions. Trend Vision One supports cloud, hybrid, and on-premise deployments, beneficial for diverse infrastructures, though initial setup may involve complexity. Its support is recognized for effective communication.

Pricing and ROI: Arista NDR is competitively priced, often providing significant ROI through enhanced network security and resource savings. Its integration with managed services can optimize costs. Trend Vision One's pricing, reflecting its broad capabilities, might be considered high, yet its adjustable features and credit system permit cost control, presenting good value via centralized management, potentially lowering total cost of ownership.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista NDR vs. Trend Vision One Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arista NDR vs. Trend Vision One

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista NDR

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

11th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (8th)

Trend Vision One

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (3rd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (3rd), AI Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Arista NDR is 3.5%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trend Vision One	2.1%
Arista NDR	3.5%
Other	94.4%

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1719513

Chief Technology Officer at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

it's much easier to create your own queries and hunt for threats

We take in IOCs from my SOC and from AlienVault, and then we focus on traffic that hits IOCs and alerts us to it. The one thing that the Awake platform lacks is the ability to automate the ingestion of IOCs rather than having to import CSV files or JSON files manually. Awake didn't support the manual importation of CSV and JSON in version 3.0, but they added it in version 4.0. It's helpful, but it still has to be a specific CSV format. Automated IOCs are on the roadmap. Hopefully, they will be able to automate the ingestion of IOCs by Q1 next year. I'm currently leveraging Mind Meld, an open-source tool by Palo Alto, to ingest IOCs from external parties. I aggregate those lists and spit them out as a massive list of domains, hashes, file names, IPS. Then we aggregate those into their own specific categories, like a URL category. Awake ingests that just like the Palo Alto firewall does, and then it alerts me if traffic attempts to go into it. Some of that is already on the Palo Alto firewall, which blocks it, but that doesn't mean that there is no attempted communication. I want to know if there's a communication attempt because there might be an indicator on that specific device trying to reach an IOC. Yes, my Palo Alto blocked it, but there's still something odd sitting there, and what if it can reach a different IOC that I don't have information about? I want to focus on it. I could do that by leveraging Awake if it could ingest the IOCs automatically. That's something I leverage Awake for today. I still have to manually import it, which is cumbersome because I have to manipulate the files that I get from the different IOC providers into a specific format that it understands. Once they add the ability to automate that, it'll be more useful.

Read full review

SemihDalkıran

Cyber Security Senior Technical Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Built faster threat response and improved visibility with real-time monitoring and flexible deployment

Trend Vision One allows us to monitor attacks in real time, which is a significant benefit. We can quickly see where the attack is coming from. Trend Vision One enables us to use different products with a flexible license. For example, if a customer is using endpoint security and wants to switch to another solution, they can instantly use a different Trend Micro product, such as email. Trend Vision One has helped to reduce the time to detect and respond to different threats, as it can respond to attacks very quickly. With playbook templates, in cases of recurring attacks, responses can be made quickly using predefined playbooks. Trend Vision One has helped to reduce noise from false positives. There have been false positives before, but it was due to the customer not telling us which app they were using. Best practice configurations must be applied properly to avoid such issues. Trend Vision One helps customers consolidate the use of security vendors and reduce silos by offering one platform for all product management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to see suspicious activity for devices inside my network. It helps me to quickly identify that activity and do analysis to see if it's expected or I need to mitigate that activity quickly."

"It gives us something that is almost like an auditing tool for all of our network controls, to see how they are performing. This is related to compliance so that we can see how we are doing with what we have already implemented. There are things that we implemented, but we really didn't know if they were working or not. We have that visibility now."

"This solution help us monitor devices used on our network by insiders, contractors, partners, or suppliers. Its correlation and identification of specific endpoints is very good, especially since we have a large, virtualized environment. It discerns this fairly well. Some of the issues that we have had with other tools is we sometimes are not able to tell the difference between users on some of those virtualized instances."

"Arista NDR's scalability is very good, making it easy to add more hardware components. You can order additional hardware and integrate it by stacking it with the existing setup. This feature cannot be seen in other NDR tools."

"The query language makes it easy to query the records on the network, to do searches for the various threat activities that we're looking for. The dashboard, the Security Knowledge Graph, displays information meaningfully and easily. I am able to find the information that I want to find pretty quickly."

"The most valuable portion is that they offer a threat-hunting service. Using their platform, and all of the data that they're collecting, they actually help us be proactive by having really expert folks that have insight, not just into our accounts, but into other accounts as well. They can be proactive and say, 'Well, we saw this incident at some other customer. We ran that same kind of analysis for you and we didn't see that type of activity in your network.'"

"Other solutions will say, "Hey, this device is doing something weird." But they don't aggregate that data point with other data points. With Awake you have what's called a "fact pattern." For example, if there's a smart toaster on the third floor that is beaconing out to an IP address in North Korea, sure that's bizarre. But if that toaster was made in North Korea it's not bizarre. Taking those two data points together, and automating something using machine-learning is something that no other solution is doing right now."

"When I create a workbench query in Awake to do threat hunting, it's much easier to query. You get a dictionary popup immediately when you try to type a new query. It says, "You want to search for a device?" Then you type in "D-E," and it gives you a list of commands, like device, data set behavior, etc. That gives you the ability to build your own query."

More Arista NDR pros

"I love everything about the solution, especially the XDR features, the attack surface management, and the workbench alerts. It oversees vulnerabilities among the system and devices, prioritizing areas that need patching."

"The most valuable feature is the network protection shield on every server, which isolates attacks and prevents our clients from being affected."

"I'm satisfied with the level of coverage. The policies have been very useful and detailed."

"I like that it is a comprehensive security solution with a lot of features. You can say XDR is an end-to-end security solution with endpoint security. It includes all your servers, networks, and other devices. The endpoint security solution does not cover this. Plus, machine learning and features like that are the main things in XDR solutions."

"One of the best decisions we made was choosing Trend Vision One; it has transformed our entire security and cybersecurity landscape, providing a one-stop solution to manage everything efficiently and effectively."

"The comprehensive overview of the security status is the most valuable feature of Trend Vision One, and its ability to provide centralized visibility and management is quite good because all the relevant data are present, providing everything needed."

"I like the workbench. It is a view of all the alerts or problems in your estate. The visibility that it provides to engineers is very useful. It is one thing having lots of alerts. It is another thing to have something to correlate all your alerts into a workbench for you so that you can see what is going on."

"Trend Vision One gives us better visibility to detect and respond to threats because we can now see more than ever before."

More Trend Vision One pros

Cons

"Arista NDR needs to open legal offices to be closer to customers and partners. It needs more visibility in the NDR market in the Middle East. While they are doing well, they lack sufficient engineers. They need to hire more engineers to meet the demand and expand their presence. The current team is good but not enough to fully capture the market."

"Be prepared to update your SOPs to have your analysts work in another tool separately. There are some limitations in the integrations right now. One of the things that I want from a security standpoint is integration with multiple tools so I don't need to have my analysts logging into each individual tool."

"The one thing that the Awake platform lacks is the ability to automate the ingestion of IOCs rather than having to import CSV files or JSON files manually."

"While the appliance is very good, and I think they're working on it, it would probably help if they integrated the management team cases into the appliance so that everything we are working on with them would be accessible on our platform, on the dashboard, on the portal. Right now, Awake is just an additional team that uses the appliance that we use and then we communicate with them directly. Communication isn't through the portal."

"They've been focused on really developing their data science, their ability to detect, but over time, they need to be able to tie into other systems because other systems might detect something that they don't."

"I enjoy the query language, but it could be a bit more user-friendly, especially for new users who come across it... They should push it more into a natural language style as opposed to a query language."

"I would like to see a bit more in terms of encrypted traffic. With the advent of programs that live off the land, a smart attacker is going to leverage encryption to execute their operation. So I would like to see improvements there, where possible. Currently, we're not going to be decrypting encrypted traffic. What other approaches could be used?"

"There's room for improvement with some of the definitions, because I don't have time and I'm not a Tier 4 analyst. I believe that is something they're working towards."

More Arista NDR cons

"The SOAR features (Security Playbooks) are quite limited."

"The only disappointing aspect is that every time new features are adopted, additional credits are required, which could push the budget over. This practice should really be reconsidered by Trend."

"There should be improvements in risk quantification, where the risk is displayed in a quantified manner, showing the dollar value loss."

"Trend Micro's support is suboptimal in my region, likely due to proximity to their resources, favouring areas closer to the company. Consequently, we utilize local support providers who offer better service."

"In new versions I would like to see better implementation of the reporting features, especially in regards to EDR visibility."

"Areas that need improvement in Trend Vision One include the AI-based mechanism, AI-based detections, and AI-based autonomous detections, which are currently lacking."

"Trend Vision One would be enhanced by incorporating an SIEM solution as a built-in feature."

"Also, XDR should improve its coverage of the latest IOCs. Their suspicious object management works, but the coverage should be improved. It will take one or two months to get those things covered. XDR will detect on a behavioral basis, but these databases will not get updated daily like some other solutions. If you're dealing with new ransomware or malware, it may take around a month before it's covered by Trend Micro."

More Trend Vision One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has saved thousands of dollars within the first day. Our ROI has to be in the tens of thousands of dollars since October last year."

"The solution is very good and the pricing is also better than others..."

"We switched to Awake Security because they were able to offer a model that was significantly less expensive and the value that we get out of it is higher."

"Awake Security was the least expensive among their competitors. Everyone was within $15,000 of each other. The other solutions were not providing the MNDR service, which is standard with Awake Security's pricing/licensing model."

"Because I represent a hedge fund, I have some leverage. I told them that they had to meet my conditions if they wanted me as a client. It was the same way with Awake. They wanted an initial four-year agreement. Initially, we signed on for a one-year contract, but they wanted the four-year deal when it came time for the renewal. I told them that I was not doing that. I said that they either had to do it on my terms, or I'd go somewhere else."

"Awake's pricing was very competitive. It's not a cheap option though. It's an investment to utilize it, but it's one that we decided was worth the cost, with the managed services. At our scale, it was a much better option to utilize their software and their managed services to handle this, rather than hiring another person to be an analyst. It was quite cost-effective for us."

"The pricing seems pretty reasonable for what we get out of it. We also found it to be more competitive than some other vendors that we've looked at."

"I do not have much visibility to it. It is definitely not a cheap product, but to my knowledge, it is out there with the big wigs in the industry, such as CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and other EDR/XDR vendors. I had heard, and found out eventually, that their sales teams are very flexible, as more sales teams are."

"I find it to be a cost-efficient platform."

"Competitors offer comparable solutions at slightly lower prices, so Vision One has room to reduce its pricing by 15 percent, given that Trend Vision One charges approximately $10 per endpoint."

"The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side."

"They've introduced a credit system, where we purchase credits and then allocate them to the specific services we need active."

"Trend Micro XDR is expensive but we got a good deal from Trend Micro."

"Trend Micro XDR is expensive, and you have to pay for it yearly."

"Trend Micro's licensing is outsourced to third-party vendors, resulting in price variations depending on the vendor."

More Trend Vision One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	48
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arista NDR?

Arista NDR's scalability is very good, making it easy to add more hardware components. You can order additional hardware and integrate it by stacking it with the existing setup. This feature cannot...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista NDR?

The tool's pricing is expensive but it is competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista NDR?

Arista NDR needs to open legal offices to be closer to customers and partners. It needs more visibility in the NDR market in the Middle East. While they are doing well, they lack sufficient enginee...

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro XDR?

I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro XDR?

Trend Vision One is not so expensive; it is very moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trend Micro XDR?

Trend Vision One needs to work on its logging system as the logging systems are very complex, and they need to reform their logs in a more informative way.

See all answers

Comparisons

Vectra AI vs Arista NDR

Compared 17% of the time

Darktrace vs Arista NDR

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Arista NDR

Compared 11% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Arista NDR

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba IntroSpect vs Arista NDR

Compared 6% of the time

More Arista NDR Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Vision One

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Trend Vision One

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Trend Vision One

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Trend Vision One

Compared 7% of the time

More Trend Vision One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arista NDR

December 2025

Download Arista NDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trend Vision One

December 2025

Download Trend Vision One product report

Also Known As

Awake Security Platform

Trend Micro XDR, Trend Micro XDR for Users, Trend Vision One - XDR for Networks

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Arista

Trend Micro

Overview

Arista NDR (formerly Awake Security) is the only advanced network detection and response company that delivers answers, not alerts. By combining artificial intelligence with human expertise, Arista NDR hunts for both insider and external attacker behaviors, while providing autonomous triage and response with full forensics across traditional, IoT, and cloud networks. Arista NDR delivers continuous diagnostics for the entire enterprise threat landscape, processes countless network data points, senses abnormalities or threats, and reacts if necessary—all in a matter of seconds. The Arista NDP platform stands out from traditional security because it is designed to mimic the human brain. It recognizes malicious intent and learns over time, giving defenders greater visibility and insight into what threats exist and how to respond to them.

The Advent of Advanced Network Detection and Response & Why it Matters

The 5 Levels of Autonomous Security paper

Arista

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Trend Vision One provides a sophisticated security platform combining endpoint, network, and email protection with features like virtual patching and advanced AI capabilities. Its centralized management and integration with platforms like Office 365 and Azure make it an attractive option for organizations needing streamlined workflows and efficient risk management. While it boasts robust integrations and ease of use, enhancements are needed in reporting, tool integration, and reducing false positives. Users call for better support infrastructure, faster response times, and improved threat intelligence capabilities. Despite some complexity, its AI and ML features significantly enhance threat detection and response.

What Features Define Trend Vision One?

Comprehensive Protection: Guard endpoints, networks, and emails against threats.
Centralized Visibility: Monitor systems with a unified view.
Advanced AI and ML: Improve threat detection and response capabilities.
Virtual Patching: Address vulnerabilities without immediate updates.
Integrated Management: Seamlessly manage across platforms.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Streamlined Workflows: Enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Threat Detection: Leverage AI for better response.
Ease of Deployment: Simplified initial setup and configuration.
Effective Risk Management: Benefit from centralized and integrated security tools.
Integration Capabilities: Flexibility to connect with different tools and platforms.

Trend Vision One is implemented in industries that require endpoint protection, ransomware defense, and incident response, being flexible for both on-premises and cloud environments. It is used to monitor servers, networks, and endpoints, providing features like email protection, behavioral detection, and threat visibility. Organizations benefit from AI and ML, improving their security posture and response capabilities.

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

- Dolby Laboratories- Seattle Genetics- ARM Energy- Ooma- Prophix- Yapstone

Panasonic North America, Decathlon, Fischer Homes, Banijay Benelux, Unigel, DHR Health,

Buyer's Guide

Arista NDR vs. Trend Vision One

December 2025

Free Report: Arista NDR vs. Trend Vision One

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista NDR vs. Trend Vision One and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista NDR vs. Trend Vision One report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.