Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Arctic Wolf Networks Logo
748 views|416 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
14,255 views|10,885 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arctic Wolf Managed Risk and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them.""We have a patch management solution that scans for any patches that can be applied and then applies these patches, but it doesn't hit everything. It also doesn't find all misconfigurations and things like that. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk kind of fills in the gaps and makes us aware of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that exist out there. It does an agent scan for software versions and compares them to what CVs are out there and lets us know.""This solution has made huge strides in improving the awareness of our end users.""We get access to quarterly reviews with their team.""The most valuable feature of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is being informed about what vulnerabilities there are exposed currently."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Pros →

"The solution has a lean and easy-to-use interface that is not confusing to first-time users.""Feature-wise, Tenable Security Center is a very fast tool with many dashboards and reports, and it covers all our systems.""The scanning part, the agent part – that's the valuable aspect.""Tenable SC's most valuable features are the low number of false positives and the strong capability of providing prioritization for the vulnerabilities detected.""Support is knowledgeable.""We use Tenable to scan all of our environments and plugins for vulnerabilities. Tenable helps us discover network vulnerabilities to threats and piracy.""The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements.""The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy."

More Tenable Security Center Pros →

Cons
"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect.""The scalability could improve.""The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution.""Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations.""As far as the product is concerned, I would really like the scanning feature to let us know that a threat has been addressed once we apply the relevant patch. We are not seeing this currently when running a scan."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Cons →

"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved.""The solution is expensive.""The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy.""The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features.""The user interface can be improved.""Support could be faster.""The solution's user interface has some issues.""A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."

More Tenable Security Center Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It depends on the company size quite a bit."
  • "The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."
  • "Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."
  • More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."
  • "We're able to save because we don't have to employ more staff members to help wit ht he scheduling of the scans, running the reports or sending them out to the systems owners. That alone is a big ROI for us."
  • "The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."
  • "The pricing is more than Nexpose."
  • "Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."
  • "We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."
  • "We pay around 60,000 on a yearly basis."
  • "The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."
  • More Tenable Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT… more »
    Top Answer:Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten.
    Top Answer:Arctic Wolf Managed Risk needs to add more integrations.
    Top Answer:The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.
    Top Answer:I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive.
    Top Answer:The tool's initial configuration is not so easy. The hardware requirements related to the tool need to be better because we need a lot of memory to achieve speed in the solution. If our company needs… more »
    Ranking
    24th
    Views
    748
    Comparisons
    416
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    9.0
    1st
    Views
    14,255
    Comparisons
    10,885
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    431
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter
    Learn More
    Overview

    Delivered by security experts - Concierge Security® Team; the Arctic Wolf® Managed Risk solution enables you to define and contextualize your attack surface coverage across your networks, endpoints, and cloud environments; provides you with the risk priorities in your environment; and advises you on your remediation actions to ensure that you are benchmarking against configuration best practices and continually hardening your security posture.

    Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

    Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

    Sample Customers
    Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice
    IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise40%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Security Center
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is ranked 24th in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is rated 8.6, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk writes "Reasonably priced with helpful quarterly reviews and excellent reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Adlumin Security Operations Platform and Wiz, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai. See our Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Tenable Security Center report.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.