We performed a comparison between Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and Forescout XDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Networks, Palo Alto Networks, Netsurion and others in SOC as a Service."The integration between Cisco AMPs and the Windows servers is most valuable. So, they can also sandbox machines on which they see something suspicious."
"They have a portal where you can evaluate and mitigate any vulnerabilities that you and your network might have."
"They provide useful quarterly updates."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its ease of implementation."
"Security protection is the best feature of this product."
"The agents give pretty good visibility into what is happening at the endpoint."
"Whenever there is a major thing like Exchange vulnerabilities, it scans our Exchange server for indicators of compromise. It then alerts us and points exactly where we need to go to check for ourselves if it is normal or not."
"The visibility into our endpoints is huge."
"The product has valuable features for cloud IoT device enhancement, intelligent threat detection, etc."
"We get a lot of false alarms, but that's because they don't know our network in detail. I think that could be alleviated if we told them more about our network so they could create rules to skip some of those things."
"I would actually be interested in having fewer features at a lower price."
"More integrations with various security tools to improve data ingestion would be beneficial."
"They focus on detecting administrator-level control compromises. Because they're focusing more on administrator-level compromise, they are less able to see if an individual user has been compromised. It is, admittedly, very difficult because they don't know what normal human behavior is. If a hacker compromises a human account and then acts just like the human, how are you ever going to notice, unless you have some inside knowledge of how the company works? For example, they overlook account lockouts on user accounts, whereas in our own alerting system, we do not. We review every account lockout, and if it is bad, we contact the person, whereas they think of that as noise because they're more focused on the administrator-level compromise."
"I would like to see them build the ability to co-sell an EDR platform, manage an EDR or manage the actual response, potentially from the issues that are coming up from the security risks."
"It would be great if the whole process of determining vendor risk could be simplified by Arctic Wolf."
"In the future, I would like to see a summary report."
"It can sometimes take up to an hour to get notification of a problem and that's a long time."
"The product is more expensive than other vendors in terms of features."
More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is ranked 1st in SOC as a Service with 17 reviews while Forescout XDR is ranked 9th in SOC as a Service with 1 review. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is rated 9.2, while Forescout XDR is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response writes "Very good support, excellent visibility, and useful security bulletins". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout XDR writes "Provides efficient network access control, but its support services need improvement". Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Red Canary MDR, Huntress, Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting and SentinelOne Vigilance, whereas Forescout XDR is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon.
See our list of best SOC as a Service vendors.
We monitor all SOC as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.