No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AppIdentity vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AppIdentity
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
82nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (18th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of AppIdentity is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla2.3%
AppIdentity0.1%
Other97.6%
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use AppIdentity?
Leave a review
EA
Data Engineer at Baker Hughes
Automated access reviews have reduced hidden bot risks and create audit evidence seamlessly
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla's access reviews, audit report generation, and compliance features are excellent. It creates audit and compliance evidence easily, which previously required substantial manual effort, but now the process has become very straightforward. The best feature is definitely the AI component, which includes evidence generation for audit and compliance, addressing one of our biggest challenges. We are able to easily gather all the details required by the audit team, and that is one of the best aspects. Additionally, being cloud-based means it is very easy to scale up without much downtime compared to our previous on-premises solution. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has positively impacted our organization by significantly reducing manual effort. We previously had many unnoticed non-human accounts that we could not deactivate due to their large number, but now that timeframe has drastically decreased, which is one of the greatest advantages. The AI-driven access reviews and automatic generation of compliance and audit documents are among the best features.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Security Firm
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
6%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?
It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factor...
What needs improvement with Zilla Security?
The challenges I face with the implementation of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla involve legacy applications and legacy systems, which sometimes present issues. Additionally, custom-built APIs that a...
What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?
The main use cases for CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla include onboarding users when they are being recruited, as well as managing the moving and exiting processes. When a user like James moves from ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Zilla Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Swisscom , Telstra, ADP, COMCAST BUSINESS, Copper
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, Microsoft, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: February 2026.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.