We performed a comparison between Appian and CucumberStudio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable feature is business automation."
"The application life cycle is very clear. I started learning it and giving some workshops to my team. Creating the users and the building is very structured. Documentation is nice and it's easy to learn."
"Another advantage of this tool is its reports and records. You can maintain dashboards, layouts. If you with a Java solution, it takes six months time. If you use this tool, you can finish in one or one and a half months' time."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use."
"Appian's most valuable features are the quick time it takes to develop for the market. It's easy and faster than other BPM solutions."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"It is also not easy to learn. Training tutorials could be improved."
"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"One room for improvement is the ease of UI UX development, like in OutSystems and Mendix."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"I would like to see better customer support."
Appian is ranked 6th in Rapid Application Development Software with 58 reviews while CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while CucumberStudio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.