

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Apache JMeter are competitors in the performance testing category. LoadRunner Enterprise seems to have the upper hand in protocol support and detailed insights, whereas JMeter benefits from being a cost-effective solution with good community support.
Features: LoadRunner Enterprise supports extensive protocol varieties, allowing it to simulate real-world scenarios comprehensively. Its load simulation and reporting features provide detailed insights into application response times and infrastructure metrics. JMeter, being open-source, offers cost-effectiveness and good integration capabilities with various tools, though with limited protocol support.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Enterprise could refine its user interface, enhance cloud offerings, and improve its reporting efficiency. Stability issues are also noted occasionally. JMeter could enhance its capability to handle larger loads, improve documentation, and offer more robust automation features. Additionally, support for various protocols and advanced real-time analytics could be stronger.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Enterprise primarily supports on-premises deployments with some cloud and hybrid options, accompanied by a comprehensive support system. JMeter, known for its flexibility, supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments and benefits from a large user community, although its direct support is less responsive.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Enterprise is considered costly, especially for extensive protocol support, but it offers a significant return on investment through comprehensive application insights. JMeter, as an open-source tool, incurs no licensing fees, making it appealing for smaller projects or those with limited budgets, though it may necessitate additional investments for complex scenarios.
With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.
I have not seen a return on investment right now, as there is no improvement in Apache JMeter and reduction in cost, but I save time and reduce costs with Apache JMeter.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
With AI models ChatGPT, troubleshooting issues has become very easy for us.
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
We do have some methods where we can distribute the complete load between multiple systems and then try to do our testing.
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
Previous versions of Apache JMeter were a little unstable, but the new versions are very stable.
However, it remains quite stable.
With AI becoming more prominent, they can implement features where it can generate code by itself based on the results or provide suggestions.
Currently, we need to use multiple separate JMeter instances to simulate reductions in load, which isn't ideal.
The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.
It's a cost-effective solution.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Apache JMeter | 10.4% |
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.5% |
| Other | 83.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 27 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
Apache JMeter is a versatile, open-source tool designed for performance and load testing, widely recognized for its user-friendly interface and robust test automation capabilities. It supports a range of protocols and integrates seamlessly into various environments, making it ideal for high-load scenarios.
Apache JMeter stands out in performance testing for its ability to handle high transactions per second and perform distributed load testing effectively. Its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness are enhanced by its user-friendly GUI, which simplifies the testing process. Despite memory consumption concerns, Apache JMeter remains a top choice due to its large community support, comprehensive scripting capabilities, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous automated testing. Its robust protocol support meets diverse testing needs.
What are Apache JMeter's key features?In industries like finance and banking, Apache JMeter is used extensively for performance validation to ensure system robustness under heavy user loads. It's integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing processes, allowing organizations to simulate real-world scenarios and ensure high-performance standards.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.
What are the essential features?In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.