Amazon QLDB vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
285 views|201 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,346 views|1,096 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Balasubramanyam Kamarapu
GLEDSONCOOPER
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product enables the users to query results faster."

More Amazon QLDB Pros →

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability.""NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go.""The tool is easy to learn.""The tool performs well."

More Oracle NoSQL Pros →

Cons
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."

More Amazon QLDB Cons →

"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options.""The installation is difficult.""The licensing model is bad.""Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

More Oracle NoSQL Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is not expensive."
  • More Amazon QLDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."
  • More Oracle NoSQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product enables the users to query results faster.
    Top Answer:The product should enable users to import data from various databases. It would be a nice additional improvement. It should also provide more instances.
    Top Answer:The product must be added to a cloud platform. The link to Oracle must be provided on the cloud platform. It will help people to integrate the tool easily. We need the solution mainly for updating or… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    285
    Comparisons
    201
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.0
    8th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,346
    Comparisons
    1,096
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 45% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 29% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Amazon Quantum Ledger Database
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon QLDB is a fully managed ledger database that provides a transparent, immutable, and cryptographically verifiable transaction log ‎owned by a central trusted authority. Amazon QLDB tracks each and every application data change and maintains a complete and verifiable history of changes over time.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

    For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

    Sample Customers
    accenture, digital asset, health direct, klarna, osano, realm, smaato, splunk, wipro, zilliant
    Airbus, Globacom, WebAction
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Amazon QLDB is most compared with MongoDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Couchbase.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.