No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon Fraud Detector vs Forter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Fraud Detector
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Forter
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
6th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Amazon Fraud Detector is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Forter is 3.6%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Forter3.6%
Amazon Fraud Detector1.6%
Other94.8%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1461372 - PeerSpot reviewer
Graduate Analytics Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Quickly and reliably identifies potentially fraudulent activity
The problem I was facing, from a machine learning perspective, it only had a supervised learning capability. You would have to provide your data live, but in fraud, the pattern of the fraudsters keeps changing and it's impossible to provide data labels. That's where the user unsupervised learning comes in handy — you don't have to tell them, "okay, this is fraud and this is not fraud." If unsupervised learning was also incorporated with Amazon SageMaker, that would be really cool. I am talking about anomaly detection algorithms, like isolation, forest, or anything on the neural network side for anomaly detection, including autoencoders. These are some things which companies would really like to use. There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option.
reviewer1460475 - PeerSpot reviewer
Center Lead Developer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses
This solution is scalable. You can add more users onto it because they raise the level depending on the traffic that you give them. For instance, if I'm going to send 1,000 evaluations every minute and then 10,000 evaluations every minute, the solution needs to be able to adjust. For them, it was quite easy to scale. I was using this solution in a team of seven people. Maintenance was also carried out by the team. We worked with tickets and when we saw that there was a new version or we needed changes that required integration, anyone working on the team could do it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, we got some really good results; we got roughly a 77% recall, which meant 77% of the total fraud was actually picked up by Amazon Fraud Detector."
"Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
"Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
 

Cons

"There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option."
"There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option."
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
"I would like to see more granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
15%
Retailer
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AWS Cloud9 IDE, Cloud9 IDE
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Kiwi.com, Fiverr, James Allen
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.