Amazon Aurora vs SingleStore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,738 views|4,228 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SingleStore Logo
308 views|238 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Aurora and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Relational Databases Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer.""The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling.""The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature.""The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively.""Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.""The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy.""We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

More Amazon Aurora Pros →

"MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short.""The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms.""The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes.""The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines.""The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.""It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that.""There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired.""The pricing could improve. It should be reduced.""It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers.""I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues.""The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement.""I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."

More Amazon Aurora Cons →

"The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings.""For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback.""It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks.""Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally.""Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial.""There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great.""We don't get good discounts in Pakistan."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be lower compared to its competitors."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."
  • "I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."
  • More Amazon Aurora Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • "SingleStore is a bit expensive."
  • "The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."
  • "Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."
  • "The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."
  • "They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in pricing. I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases.
    Top Answer:The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.
    Top Answer:Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM… more »
    Top Answer:There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,738
    Comparisons
    4,228
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    7.8
    6th
    Views
    308
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

    Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

    Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

    Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

    SingleStore is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and offers the SingleStore platform,which combines transactional, analytical, & vector data workloads in a real-time, unified, distributed SQL database that is MySQL and MongoDB wire protocol-compatible. SingleStoreDB Cloud is offered as a managed service on AWS, Google, and Azure and in private clouds including IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Red Hat OpenShift. Other partners (50+ in all) include HPE, Twingo, Data-Sleek, Datadog, and Arcion. SingleStoreDB Self-Managed runs on premise/containers/Kubernetes. SingleStore has offices in Sunnyvale, Seattle, Portland, Raleigh, Boston, London, Dublin, Lisbon, Kyiv, Hyderabad, and Singapore, with remote workers worldwide. It has hundreds of customers including 100+ Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc. 5000 brands across 37 verticals, with the top four being financial services and fintech; media, streaming, and telecommunications; adtech/martech/salestech; and retail/eCommerce. SingleStore platform features include Code Engine with WASM, Data API, dbt Connector, Limitless Point-in-Time Recovery, MongoDB API, Pipelines, Unlimited (Bottomless) Storage, and Workspaces.

    Sample Customers
    Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel
    SingleStore has hundreds of customers including 100+ Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc. 5000 brands across 37 verticals, with the top four being financial services and fintech; media, streaming, and telecommunications; adtech/martech/salestech; and retail/eCommerce. Sample customers include: 6Sense Adobe Akamai CARFAX Cigna Cisco Comcast DBS Bank Dell GE Goldman Sachs Heap Hulu IMAX Kakao Kroger LiveRamp Lumana NBC Outreach Palo Alto Networks Siemens SiriusXM SK Telecom SKAI Sony STC TATA ZoomInfo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Aurora is ranked 10th in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 7 reviews. Amazon Aurora is rated 7.8, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon Aurora writes "Easy-to-manage platform with a valuable auto-scaling feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". Amazon Aurora is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MariaDB and CockroachDB, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata, Oracle Database and CockroachDB.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.