We performed a comparison between MongoDB Atlas and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can start quickly on projects which allow you to store many things."
"The solution is easily scalable and manageable. Tools can be easily added to the solution."
"MongoDB Atlas is very easy to use and user-friendly, and you get what you're paying for."
"It has a flexible integration with our easy API."
"Administering the solution is easy."
"It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data."
"The product is user-friendly."
"The auto-scaling feature is the most valuable aspect."
"It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data."
"MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."
"The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms."
"The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines."
"The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes."
"The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown."
"It would be great if it were easier to integrate MongoDB Atlas with AWS services. Technical support for MongoDB Atlas could be better."
"The initial configuration fine-tuning for performance can be time-consuming."
"The speed when combining two documents is concerning."
"There are some features that could be useful for the customers I work with, which are related to migration from on-prem to the cloud."
"The product does not have ORM."
"The product's data aggregation feature needs to work faster."
"I would like a more comprehensive dashboard."
"The UI is not currently designed in a manner to make it possible for a non-technical person or a layman to update the database easily."
"For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback."
"The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings."
"It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks."
"There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great."
"We don't get good discounts in Pakistan."
"Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally."
"Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial."
MongoDB Atlas is ranked 3rd in Database as a Service with 42 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 6th in Database as a Service with 7 reviews. MongoDB Atlas is rated 8.4, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of MongoDB Atlas writes "Allows our business to analyze social media data with machine learning and store the data in MongoDB". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". MongoDB Atlas is most compared with Amazon RDS, SQL Azure, Google Cloud SQL, Oracle Database as a Service and Google Cloud Spanner, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata, CockroachDB and Oracle Database. See our MongoDB Atlas vs. SingleStore report.
See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.