Alfabet FastLane vs LeanIX comparison

"The solution has provided us with a view of the truth in terms of our application portfolio."

"One of the most valuable features of LeanIX is the Enterprise Architecture Management tool."

"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."

"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and the user experience. It's easy to map the fact sheets."

"The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies."

"The usability is very high. It almost looks like a Facebook for Enterprise architecture, it's pretty nice. It's HTML5 based. The repository is very easy. It has 10 different ways of sorting the objects you have in your architecture repository. Maintaining new data or to add data to your repository is very easy."

"The solution provides a single window view of business, application, data, and technology views of the IT ecosystem."

"I like LeanIX's ease of use in general."

"I would rate LeanIX at an 8.5, trending towards nine."

"The initial setup is challenging because it relies on information from different stakeholders."

"LeanIX should improve its support services."

"Improvements in user interface simplicity could be made, particularly with the reporting and filtering capabilities."

"Another area for improvement is that when you're starting to look into more advanced information, using the solution's APIs and its customizations, documentation for that specific aspect is not very good. There is not too much support built into the offering for that aspect, for a developer."

"Adjustments related to specific organizational requirements are complex."

"The initial setup has room for improvement."

"They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them."

"It's hard to predict the pricing of the system."

"What would make LeanIX better is more variety in terms of reporting, and more flexibility with its data importing feature."

"I am with a third-party so am not privy to costs."

"LeanIX uses application-based account licensing, where the cost is multiplied by the number of applications in the software implementation."

"I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The tool needs to include more flexible licensing options. We do not use the tool all the time. So pricing should be considered only when we use the tool."

"The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money."

"As the tool is cloud-based, its cost is more affordable."

"There is a sweet spot of where they need to be on pricing right now. They could go up a little bit in pricing, but it has to do with the cost savings, and it has to do with the practitioners using it. I use it where I get cost savings and I can justify it, but they probably have the ability to flex a 10% up channel on their sales on that. So, they could increase their settle price, not their offering price, when they sell. They can probably hold that up a little bit higher than it is because there are cost savings that we can drive from it."

"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is competitive and in line with other products."

"It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications."