We performed a comparison between Alfabet FastLane and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management."The solution has provided us with a view of the truth in terms of our application portfolio."
"The demand management tool is very strategic because it helps assess risk, gives you a visual of different demands, and rates those values."
"We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network engineering teams. When there's an issue at the product or network level, we raise a ticket, and our team works together to resolve it."
"The performance is good."
"You don't need a lot of plugins."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very intuitive to set up."
"The solution is scalable."
"Stable and scalable solution."
"The program is stable."
"The initial setup is challenging because it relies on information from different stakeholders."
"The interface is cluttered with a lot of names and areas. It may not be user friendly enough for a first timer."
"The only issue for us is the pricing. It’s quite high in comparison with the competition."
"The solution needs a few things in terms of resource management."
"The user interface could be more modern."
"The setup is a bit complex. It depends on the organizational needs, and sometimes, we make customizations based on those needs."
"We track salaries or paychecks of the resources. They change from time to time, such as every six months or every year. If they can come up with a default or out-of-the-box feature to manage those multiple payable costs so that we can automatically calculate the project costs rolled up. That would be the coolest feature that we can expect from ServiceNow. We would like to have an automatic feature to manage the payable costs. We should be able to manage or maintain multiple pay costs so that while calculating the project roll-up costs for individual projects, the respective pay costs in a particular period are picked up automatically from the backend. Currently, we have to customize that. It is doable. We have done it but through customization."
"When we import a really big project with a lot of tasks on it, we face some issues with dependencies. The links between tasks are not working very well. There is definitely room for improvement there. Microsoft Project, in my opinion, is the best option for such a use case."
"ServiceNow needs to invest more in integration. That's the only thing. It could always extend its portfolio a little bit."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alfabet FastLane is ranked 15th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Alfabet FastLane is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alfabet FastLane writes "A clear view for managing portfolio growth, governance, and cost drivers or containment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Alfabet FastLane is most compared with Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and Smartsheet.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.