Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alcatel-Lucent Teldat vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alcatel-Lucent Teldat
Ranking in Wireless WAN
8th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Alcatel-Lucent Teldat is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Kannan Venkatraman - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a lifetime warranty, is reliable, has good technical support, and includes security features
The stability is excellent. It comes with a lifetime warranty. Even if you're going through a difficult patch. If there is a failure in that scenario, it is very minor. We were never encountered that, but If it happens, it's probably due to a web party, such as a power fluctuation. Even our power supply includes a hardware replacement. As a result, there are no issues with the even power supply's lifetime warranty. In the general market, other competitor products, the power supply will not be covered, even though we are covering the power supply with a hardware replacement warranty. Which is where we have an advantage. Security features are included.
SunilNair2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable wireless connectivity supports seamless hospital staff mobility
We use HPE Wireless WAN for hospital purposes. In our hospital, all the staff have laptops and move around, hence the need for wireless connectivity. We also provide guest access to patient rooms, including ICU rooms, where patients stay HPE Wireless WAN provides reliable connectivity. We use it…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"When you go on the website, everything is clear and you don't have to ask questions."
"The stability is excellent."
"The tool can work without distributor architecture or seller access points."
"HPE Wireless WAN provides reliable connectivity."
"The performance is good."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"HP Wireless offers competitive pricing compared to Cisco and Fortinet."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
 

Cons

"Alcatel-Lucent Teldat needs to reduce its price."
"I would like to see something for remote working."
"The price could be reduced."
"Integration might be improved, particularly with a single sign-on for Active Directory."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a one-time licensing fee. There is no need to renew it."
"The solution's licensing costs are one-time. It is not expensive. I rate its pricing a four out of ten. It provides us with a lifetime warranty."
"I don't find this solution expensive but pricing is relative."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"I find the price to be reasonable."
"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Alcatel-Lucent Teldat?
The tool can work without distributor architecture or seller access points.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alcatel-Lucent Teldat?
The solution's licensing costs are one-time. It is not expensive. I rate its pricing a four out of ten. It provides us with a lifetime warranty.
What needs improvement with Alcatel-Lucent Teldat?
Alcatel-Lucent Teldat needs to reduce its price.
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
Stability is an issue, as the access point becomes overloaded with more than twenty connections. Additionally, the current product uses two antennas. Increasing to four antennas could benefit us.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Alcatel Lucent Teldat, Teldat
Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blickle and Scherer, Loughborough University, CSF Inox, Caritas Speyer
Bell Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about Alcatel-Lucent Teldat vs. HPE Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.