Akamai CloudTest vs Tricentis Flood comparison

Akamai and Tricentis are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #16. Akamai holds a 3.7% mindshare in LTT, compared to Tricentis’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,100 Views
946 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Tricentis Flood

Read 3 Tricentis Flood reviews

718 Views
675 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Tricentis Flood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Tricentis Flood compete in performance testing. Tricentis Flood appears to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities and adaptable feature set, making it more suitable for modern development practices.

Features: Akamai CloudTest offers large-scale test handling, real-time insights, and visual test creation. Tricentis Flood integrates with CI/CD tools, provides flexible load generation, and supports multi-cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest uses cloud infrastructure for scaling and deployment, with direct support and detailed documentation. Tricentis Flood supports both cloud and on-premises deployment and offers comprehensive service and resources, with an advantage in multi-cloud flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest may require higher upfront investment but provides significant ROI in complex scenarios. Tricentis Flood offers cost-effective pricing and flexible subscription models, ensuring high ROI through integration and resource efficiency, often more attractive for DevOps and agile methodologies.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis Flood Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis Flood

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (8th)

Tricentis Flood

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Flood is 2.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai CloudTest	3.7%
Tricentis Flood	2.9%
Other	93.4%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Test Process Consultant

SME (Subject Matter Expert) at Maersk

Need improvements ,but has cloud and on-premises options

The solution is not in an optimal state. During POC, we analyzed tool is kept on upgrading. The patch deployment is happening in parallel, things that are working today are not working tomorrow. We eventually sorted it out with help of CSM. We integrated this tool with other software such as Azure client, but many times without a valid or visible reason, the connectivity was breaking. Improvement suggestions- The dashboard creation for the reporting needs to be easier. Currently, the solution does not support multiple script executions and we would like to see support for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"Their technical support is awesome."

"You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises; that is a very good part of the solution."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need."

"You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need."

Cons

"Akamai CloudTest integration into our current CI/CD pipelines identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market and release."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"The solution is not in an optimal state."

"The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state."

"The performance of the tool needs to improve."

"We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool."

"The solution lacks a little bit in the reporting features."

"The performance of the tool needs to improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."

"This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Do you recommend Tricentis Flood?

Tricentis Flood is the kind of versatile load and performance testing solution that my organization and I cannot help but recommend. It is recognized by companies across a wide variety of fields as...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Tricentis Flood

Compared 22% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Tricentis Flood

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis Flood

Compared 18% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis Flood

Compared 10% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Tricentis Flood

Compared 8% of the time

More Tricentis Flood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

May 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Tricentis Flood product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Flood IO

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based performance testing tool designed to offer scalable load testing for enterprise applications, providing seamless integration, continuous testing, and actionable insights for improved software delivery.

Tricentis Flood assists in identifying performance bottlenecks before they impact end-users. It supports large-scale load tests and integrates effortlessly with CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that performance testing is embedded early in the development lifecycle. Users can execute thousands of load tests simultaneously, analyze real-time results, and make data-driven decisions to enhance software quality.

What features make Tricentis Flood valuable?

Cloud-Based Load Testing: Allows running global load tests without infrastructure constraints.
Continuous Testing Integration: Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated testing.
Scalable Architecture: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users without performance drop.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into application performance under load.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating?

Reduced Downtime: Detects performance issues early, minimizing production failures.
Cost Efficiency: Eliminates the need for expensive hardware with cloud-based testing.
Improved User Satisfaction: Ensures applications perform well under peak load conditions.
Faster Time to Market: Accelerates release cycles by integrating testing within development processes.

In finance, Tricentis Flood helps ensure smooth operations during high-volume transactions. In retail, it prepares eCommerce platforms for peak shopping seasons by simulating anticipated user loads. Meanwhile, in healthcare, it tests application scalability to reliably handle increased patient data exchange during critical times.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis Flood

April 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis Flood

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis Flood report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.