Akamai CloudTest vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Akamai and Tricentis are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Akamai holds a 3.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to Tricentis’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,100 Views
913 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Tricentis NeoLoad

Read 67 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

5,592 Views
4,306 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Tricentis NeoLoad

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Tricentis NeoLoad are in the performance testing category, with NeoLoad having the upper hand due to its extensive features and perceived value.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is strong in large-scale test handling, real-time analytics, and seamless integration. Tricentis NeoLoad is known for its high scalability, ability to reuse scripts, and integration with CI/CD pipelines, providing broader testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance scalability, expand its script reuse options, and improve integration with modern CI/CD systems. Tricentis NeoLoad may improve its user interface, reduce learning curve complexities, and enhance script creation speed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest provides straightforward deployment with exceptional customer service known for quick issue resolution. Tricentis NeoLoad offers flexible deployment options and comprehensive customer support that facilitates swift problem resolution, making it preferable for customers seeking deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest is praised for its competitive pricing and strong ROI due to its efficient capabilities. Tricentis NeoLoad, despite being more expensive, justifies its cost through high ROI linked to its advanced features and comprehensive testing capabilities, making it a worthwhile investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis NeoLoad

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.5%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad is 10.7%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad	10.7%
Akamai CloudTest	3.5%
Other	85.8%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Psadish Kumar

Senior Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Performance testing has improved daily analysis workflows and supports detailed repair decisions

For Tricentis NeoLoad, I don't think there is much that needs improvement. Probably the use of the features can be made much more user-friendly, but this one didn't take it. Other than that, I'm not sure what could be improved. I would probably like to see some new functionalities for Tricentis NeoLoad, such as a converting mechanism, so that if my earlier project could be running, loader, some of the tools, if they have the converter-enabled in the back to the tool, probably I can just use the converter, and they would do the script conversion. For our script, they are open to order at the new system. Other than that, probably they can bring them into that suite together to the new role so they can utilize that as well to do some data population there. For now, we could have some product to create the data, and then we would like to ask in another. Then we did two reviews; it probably says that has been enabled for the tool. That will be once using so that we can have a single source which can run yet, as it's currently running one for a function or a performance. They don't have anything for this data, actually. That is also there, so we can just move. We can just move left to that. That can be used as a platform for both functional support system, but we can do that as very effective. If there are something like service utilization and the ability to place some of the visible analogs, that would make it much easier to have one tool that scales all the services.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"Wasted time in low-end work (scripting) is greatly reduced with NeoLoad."

"The dashboards give extensive statistics, which help with quick report preparation and analysis."

"The Frameworks feature is valuable. NeoLoad Web and the API are also valuable. It provides API support."

"This tool goes one step further with easy integration with code analysis tools, server monitoring, the success of correlation studio and the advantages on the mobile side."

"The most valuable feature that we've found useful is that NeoLoad provides a variety of bandwidths."

"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."

"Overall, it seems like a good product."

"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pros

Cons

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"Akamai CloudTest integration into our current CI/CD pipelines identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market and release."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols."

"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

"The ability to show transactions per second during the test run is missing; currently, we have to eyeball the TPS using the graph."

"It needs to support SAP GUI-based applications, which forms 60-70% of our portfolio, as well as Windows (client install) and Citrix-based applications."

"It needs improvements when handling binary values."

"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases."

"NeoLoad’s lack of support for a complete protocol suite is somewhat limiting."

"LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."

More Tricentis NeoLoad cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"It is cheaper than other solutions."

"NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."

"When compared to LoadRunner, NeoLoad has less costs. Compared to that, it's somehow affordable."

"I'd rate it a seven out of ten in terms of pricing"

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The tool's pricing is somewhat higher than licensed tools like LoadRunner. The approximate cost is around $25,000. There are no additional charges for maintenance or support. Everything is included in the package we have."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap, I rate Tricentis NeoLoad's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?

I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?

My relationship with Tricentis NeoLoad is that I implemented it during a trial period, and then they implemented some solution on the basis of Tricentis NeoLoad. We tested both virtual infrastructu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis NeoLoad?

The vendor offers flexible licensing options. Tricentis NeoLoad has a SaaS platform. The solution can probably be available between 30 and 50 thousand per year, while open-source tools cost way less.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 7% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 34% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 9% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 5% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis NeoLoad Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

May 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis NeoLoad

April 2026

Download Tricentis NeoLoad product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.

Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.

What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?

Team Collaboration: Enables simultaneous work across different locations.
Comprehensive Insights: Custom graph options for detailed analysis.
User-Centric Design: Simplifies scripting without extensive coding knowledge.
Protocol Support: Facilitates mobile, web, and cloud-based testing.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Jenkins, Tableau, and others.
Scalability and Monitoring: Supports real-time monitoring and API integration.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: More affordable than some competitors while offering scalable solutions.
Improved Testing Accuracy: Real-world simulation of multi-user scenarios.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports both on-premise and SaaS models.
Enhanced Application Performance: Monitors system behavior effectively.

Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

May 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.