Senior Systems Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Apr 28, 2026
In Airlock Digital Application Control, there are areas for improvement which, more specifically being a security tool, relate to the performance issues that end-user devices are experiencing because of the tool. It is getting improved on a version-to-version upgrade basis, but I would say that is one major area to improve. Otherwise, whatever is defined on the product works as expected. The performance aspect of Airlock Digital Application Control could be improved.
Group Chief Technology Officer & Privacy Officer at a construction company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
Apr 24, 2026
Regarding areas that might have room for improvement, I honestly do not have anything. I have not really thought it through, but I cannot think of anything that really needs to be improved at this stage, not from my perspective. I would have to talk to my cybersecurity coordinator to confirm, but he has never complained to me about anything, and it has always worked very well. So at this stage, do not change too much. It is a good product that needs to keep track of technology, but you have to keep that in check. As for the clarity and speed of the new user interface compared to the previous one, honestly, to me it is no different. I am not really finding it to be any different. It is good, but it is no different from what it was previously as far as efficiency is concerned. It seems fine.
Server Administrator at Kuwait National Petroleum Company
Real User
Top 10
Mar 26, 2026
If Airlock Digital Application Control implemented AI, it would be very beneficial. The solution is very easy to handle from our end, but AI implementation would make it even better. If the solution can generate an email and send requests to the call center to create a work order or change request in the upcoming updates.
Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Feb 26, 2026
There are a few areas of Airlock Digital Application Control that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. The first thing is that the new version release schedule is quite repetitive, deploying a new agent within a couple of months. This makes it difficult for us to keep in touch because we have a controlled environment, and everything must be done via change management. We cannot upgrade the server or stay up to date with the latest version all the time. Airlock Digital Application Control should release updates but also provide ample time for organizations to adapt to the latest version. The second area for improvement I think about is regarding the workflows. The workflows require careful tuning during initial rollout, especially in dynamic environments like what we have. My impression of the granular policy control offered by Airlock Digital Application Control is that it can still be improved. Granular policy control is much better for control and application. For metadata rules to work, all endpoints must be on a particular version or higher. Unfortunately, in our environment, we do not have all machines using the same client version, which becomes a problem. If you go to Airlock Digital Application Control, they have an answer that the best thing you can do is use the granular policy if you have all agents and endpoints on the same version. That is something we need to work upon. Granular policy is much better to control and apply, and this is my experience.
Manager Mssp & Cybersecurity at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Feb 12, 2026
Some of the vulnerabilities that are meant for CVEs specific to Airlock Digital Application Control need to be addressed in newer versions. This is the improvement that I would suggest, because zero-day exploits are being administered by threat actors on a daily basis, and from a cybersecurity point of view, I need it to be more resilient to vulnerabilities.
Learn what your peers think about Airlock Digital Application Control. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
Airlock Digital Application Control provides centralized policy management, aligning with compliance needs while enforcing approved software execution and enhancing cybersecurity posture. Airlock Digital Application Control offers robust application control through centralized policy management, ensuring seamless upgrades and no downtime. It integrates with InTune for app pre-approval and operates swiftly across network subnets. Primarily used for managing endpoint and server controls, it...
In Airlock Digital Application Control, there are areas for improvement which, more specifically being a security tool, relate to the performance issues that end-user devices are experiencing because of the tool. It is getting improved on a version-to-version upgrade basis, but I would say that is one major area to improve. Otherwise, whatever is defined on the product works as expected. The performance aspect of Airlock Digital Application Control could be improved.
Regarding areas that might have room for improvement, I honestly do not have anything. I have not really thought it through, but I cannot think of anything that really needs to be improved at this stage, not from my perspective. I would have to talk to my cybersecurity coordinator to confirm, but he has never complained to me about anything, and it has always worked very well. So at this stage, do not change too much. It is a good product that needs to keep track of technology, but you have to keep that in check. As for the clarity and speed of the new user interface compared to the previous one, honestly, to me it is no different. I am not really finding it to be any different. It is good, but it is no different from what it was previously as far as efficiency is concerned. It seems fine.
If Airlock Digital Application Control implemented AI, it would be very beneficial. The solution is very easy to handle from our end, but AI implementation would make it even better. If the solution can generate an email and send requests to the call center to create a work order or change request in the upcoming updates.
There are a few areas of Airlock Digital Application Control that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. The first thing is that the new version release schedule is quite repetitive, deploying a new agent within a couple of months. This makes it difficult for us to keep in touch because we have a controlled environment, and everything must be done via change management. We cannot upgrade the server or stay up to date with the latest version all the time. Airlock Digital Application Control should release updates but also provide ample time for organizations to adapt to the latest version. The second area for improvement I think about is regarding the workflows. The workflows require careful tuning during initial rollout, especially in dynamic environments like what we have. My impression of the granular policy control offered by Airlock Digital Application Control is that it can still be improved. Granular policy control is much better for control and application. For metadata rules to work, all endpoints must be on a particular version or higher. Unfortunately, in our environment, we do not have all machines using the same client version, which becomes a problem. If you go to Airlock Digital Application Control, they have an answer that the best thing you can do is use the granular policy if you have all agents and endpoints on the same version. That is something we need to work upon. Granular policy is much better to control and apply, and this is my experience.
Some of the vulnerabilities that are meant for CVEs specific to Airlock Digital Application Control need to be addressed in newer versions. This is the improvement that I would suggest, because zero-day exploits are being administered by threat actors on a daily basis, and from a cybersecurity point of view, I need it to be more resilient to vulnerabilities.