Adobe Workfront vs Sciforma comparison

Adobe and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Adobe is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9, while Sciforma is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.5. Adobe holds a 3.2% mindshare in PMS, compared to Sciforma’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 34 Adobe Workfront reviews

1,847 Views
488 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

267 Views
108 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Sciforma and Adobe Workfront serve as competitive project management solutions. Adobe Workfront seems to hold an upper hand in terms of advanced feature set and integration capabilities, while Sciforma appeals with competitive pricing and strong support services.

Features: Sciforma offers features that focus on portfolio management, resource allocation, and precise project tracking. Adobe Workfront provides a comprehensive suite of tools for seamless collaboration, extensive customization options, and integration with a wide variety of enterprise tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sciforma provides a straightforward deployment process and personalized support, favoring those who prioritize direct interaction. Adobe Workfront has a more complex deployment model supported by extensive resources and a community network, offering wider self-service resources for smoother scalability in large enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Sciforma is noted for its lower initial setup cost, advantageous for smaller teams aiming for cost-effectiveness. Adobe Workfront requires a higher upfront investment but delivers significant returns through enhanced efficiency and productivity for enterprise-level operations, justifying its cost with its robust features and strategic value.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Sciforma

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Management Software

18th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.2%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague

Sr. Manager/Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer at Staples, Inc.

Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent

Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Adobe Workfront has been stable in my experience, and I would rate its stability as an eight out of ten."

"I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application."

"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective."

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"The solution is stable."

"The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

Cons

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates."

"Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems."

"Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API."

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

43%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?

I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems. The current report is not providing the expected side-by-side comparison of capabilities,...

See all answers

What do you like most about One2team?

The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One2team?

The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One2team?

The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aprimo vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 18% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 15% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

Smartsheet vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 36% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma

Compared 20% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 17% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

June 2025

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

May 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

One2team

Overview

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Adobe

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Sciforma

June 2025

Free Report: Adobe Workfront vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Workfront vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.