We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability of the 2019 version is quite good."
"Capacity management and task baselining are the most valuable features of Microsoft Project Server."
"The solution has easy integration with Excel."
"The ability to look at the resource loading is most valuable."
"This is a scalable solution. It is easy to set up and to add clusters to your environment."
"The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning."
"The scheduling feature is the most useful."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."
"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions."
"The solution could have more compact dashboards, such as one finds with Planview."
"The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious."
"The check-in, check-out feature makes Microsoft Project Server pretty slow or cumbersome to use."
"EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available."
"It should be more agile and more flexible when it comes to customization."
"Permission management needs improvement."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.