Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma comparison

Microsoft and Sciforma are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Sciforma is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.5. Microsoft holds a 6.1% mindshare in PPM, compared to Sciforma’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sciforma users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Project Server

Read 62 Microsoft Project Server reviews

1,462 Views
746 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Sciforma

Read 3 Sciforma reviews

515 Views
314 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Project Server

Sciforma

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma are project management solutions. Sciforma seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features and simpler deployment, catering better to complex projects.

Features: Microsoft Project Server specializes in project scheduling, resource management, and integration within Microsoft products. Sciforma offers project portfolio management capabilities, advanced analytics, and customization options, providing more flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Project Server requires a complex setup using Microsoft infrastructure, while Sciforma's cloud-based model allows for simpler deployment. Sciforma provides more personalized customer support, whereas Microsoft Project Server relies on standardized channels.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Project Server has higher initial costs due to infrastructure and licenses, benefiting users within the Microsoft ecosystem. Sciforma's SaaS model offers predictable pricing with potentially faster ROI, thanks to lower startup investment and scalable pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project Server

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sciforma

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

10th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project Server is 6.1%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sciforma is 3.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Mouloud Fourali

Project Manager at Digital Research Alliance of Canada

Visual project planning enhances collaboration and proactive management

The dependency management in Microsoft Project is highly valuable, as it visually maps dependencies and impacts within a project plan. The online version facilitates easy collaboration without having to share multiple versions of the file. The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.

Read full review

Corrie De Jonge

Consultant at The Project ConneXion

A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten because it's easy. We had to really understand the solution because it's huge, and we had to know which sections to bite off first. I might even rate the initial setup a nine out of ten if you know what you've got. Once we had all our data and our migration plan, it was quite easy. The challenge lies more with the organization than the system itself. Sciforma is one of the easiest tools to get going with from a technical point of view, but knowledge is key. Deploying the solution takes from six months to a year, depending on the level of data wanted. While deploying the solution, we have to first compile the user's requirements. Then we have to drop a baseline specification in parallel with a concept rollout. Based on what's in the concept, we pick from what the client understands to be the relevant portions, the minimum requirements. Then I convert it into a project execution plan and then execute the plan. After that, we have initial data collection for configuration and then final live data. Then we have the sign-off processes of different departments. There's a lot of upfront work to get the data prepared for transmission, and that is a big challenge. We did almost a thousand projects per year, so there were quite a lot of decisions to speed up the deployment process. The biggest challenge was to get our internal data organized and map it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SharePoint site integration"

"I like being able to manage the capacity in terms of the resources. I also like being able to share documents and information between teams. It's the best solution for collaboration."

"We are able to know what we are doing, how much we have spent, how much time we've taken, and it tells us how much money is left for the project. It also tells us whether we are below or above our expenditures, whether we are below or above our budget."

"Microsoft Project Server is a powerful tool I've used for years."

"The scheduling and the customization are very powerful."

"This is a scalable solution. It is easy to set up and to add clusters to your environment."

"The technical support for Microsoft Project Server and the support is very good. Microsoft support is working very well."

"Microsoft Project Server is a scalable solution."

More Microsoft Project Server pros

"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."

"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."

Cons

"When we started using this solution from scratch, we got lost. Microsoft should provide some templates for configurations for certain use cases."

"Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your project."

"The reporting aspects can be improved, which is one of the reasons why I'm using Qlik Sense. In the older on-prem versions, reporting was lackluster, to say the least. Project Online has a better handle on that. However, we will still be using Qlik Sense. We're also looking at an add-on app from a company called OnePlan that adds some additional functionality where Microsoft is not as clean in its approach for things such as portfolio management and some of the trends analysis."

"The cost could be lower."

"The reporting in the desktop version is not highly customizable or professional compared to other solutions."

"Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly."

"Permission management needs improvement."

"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions."

More Microsoft Project Server cons

"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."

"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."

"Microsoft Project Server is more expensive than other solutions on the market. We purchase the license annually."

"There is a licensing cost."

"There are some payments related to the licensing cost of Microsoft Project Server."

"The product is expensive."

"We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft, and our licensing is based on the agreement."

"I would rate the price a six out of ten."

"We pay an annual licensing fee for the solution."

More Microsoft Project Server pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Insurance Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?

The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?

Microsoft Project Server is on the expensive side due to high licensing costs, but it is mainly accessible to project managers. Online tools are cheaper and present competition.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?

The main drawback of Microsoft Project Server is that it is offline. Having it online would offer better access to other managers.

See all answers

What do you like most about One2team?

The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One2team?

The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One2team?

The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Project vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 11% of the time

Planisware vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs Microsoft Project Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Project Server Competitors

Planisware vs Sciforma

Compared 33% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Sciforma

Compared 25% of the time

Jira vs Sciforma

Compared 15% of the time

Smartsheet vs Sciforma

Compared 12% of the time

More Sciforma Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server

July 2025

Download Microsoft Project Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

June 2025

Download Sciforma product report

Also Known As

MS Project Server

One2team

Overview

Microsoft Project Server facilitates project portfolio management and everyday collaboration, enhancing decision-making processes. Its integration with SharePoint offers a flexible solution for enterprise project management, catering to complex project needs seamlessly.

Microsoft Project Server empowers project teams and managers with enhanced communication and comprehensive project visibility. It supports dynamic resource allocation, financial tracking, and risk assessment. A cloud-ready platform, it simplifies deployment and scalability, suitable for diverse project environments and needs robust integration with leading productivity tools and services.

What are the key features of Microsoft Project Server?

Resource Management: Allocate and track resources efficiently to optimize productivity.
Portfolio Analysis: Assess and prioritize projects based on strategic alignment and constraints.
Time Reporting: Streamline time tracking and reporting for accurate project insights.
Integration with Office: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office applications for enhanced productivity.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data security with customizable permissions and compliance standards.

What benefits can users expect from Microsoft Project Server?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and collaboration among project teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers comprehensive data analytics for strategic planning.
Efficiency Gains: Streamlines project management workflows for increased productivity.
Cost Management: Enables effective budget tracking and financial control.

Industries such as construction, IT services, and pharmaceuticals leverage Microsoft Project Server for managing large-scale projects with precision. Its adaptability to different industry standards ensures specific project requirements are met while maintaining operational control and regulatory compliance.

Microsoft

Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.

Sciforma

Sample Customers

Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations

1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.