Acunetix vs SiteLock comparison

Invicti and SiteLock are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.9, while SiteLock is ranked #46. Invicti holds a 2.6% mindshare in SAST, compared to SiteLock’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SiteLock users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 36 Acunetix reviews

8,861 Views
5,051 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews

2,023 Views
526 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Acunetix

SiteLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and SiteLock compete in the web security market, offering unique solutions for vulnerability management. Acunetix appears to have the upper hand in detailed security analysis, while SiteLock excels in ease of use and swift deployment, appealing to smaller businesses.

Features: Acunetix provides in-depth security analysis, comprehensive scanning capabilities, and automated testing to identify a wide range of vulnerabilities. SiteLock offers daily monitoring, robust malware detection, and prevention features, ensuring website safety.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could improve its interface to enhance user experience, simplify initial setup, and reduce resource consumption during scans. SiteLock might enhance its reporting features, extend vulnerability management capabilities, and improve scalability for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SiteLock offers a seamless deployment process with efficient customer service focused on quick setup and immediate threat response. Acunetix, while providing powerful insights, requires more involved installation and configuration.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix involves higher initial costs due to extensive features but offers substantial long-term value by preventing costly breaches. SiteLock requires a lower upfront investment and delivers quick returns through prompt vulnerability addressing and maintaining website integrity, appealing to budget-conscious businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. SiteLock Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. SiteLock

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (15th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (5th)

SiteLock

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

46th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (18th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (38th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.6%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Acunetix	2.6%
SiteLock	0.5%
Other	96.9%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

it_user723534

Guitarist at a media company with self employed

It's not easy to get out once you're in

Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information. When you sign on for the paid service, Sitelock: * Hides (makes it difficult to find) that they default the auto-renew (you can't sign up without agreeing to have them automatically bill your credit card every year). * Hides (makes it difficult to find) how to stop auto-renew: * You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses. * You have to hunt their website for a link (in extremely small font) to the page which contains instructions for cancelling. * When you get to that page, turns out it's the 5000+ word "Terms of Service" document, which you have to scour to find a phone number. Then, you have to call and get put on hold (or if you like, they will call you back three days later). Once you finally get through, you have to jump through a lot of security hoops. All of the above, just to cancel the service. Their product may or may not be OK, but be forewarned that with Sitelock, it's not easy to get out once you're in.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"After two years it's about 300%."

"We are happy, we're not unhappy with Acunetix, but we are very impressed by some of the things that it has been doing."

"Acunetix gives us code-level identification of vulnerabilities and a good understanding of the code-level vulnerability fixes, which is much more helpful for us because we can understand how to fix the vulnerabilities at the code level."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"The solution is comprehensive and easy to use."

"If an organization has 100 plus applications and wants to use an automated scanner, they should definitely go ahead with Acunetix because it is very cost-effective and will save time compared to focusing on other solutions and performing manual security assessments."

"The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications, so that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have."

More Acunetix pros

"It seems to provide a bit of useful information on website health."

"Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue with my website, but with SiteLock I was able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches."

Cons

"Acunetix provides the benefit of saving time for an end user. I would not say it saves money because the cost and license of Acunetix is far more than what others offer."

"I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"The time to fix issues is not too quick, so in the case of time-restricted projects for some customers, this might become a problem."

"Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic."

More Acunetix cons

"Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

My main use of Acunetix is to scan my web application. I mostly deal with web applications and with Acunetix Network Security Component, but I have not activated the network component before and wi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I am still working with Acunetix, and we have even moved to their new platform, Invicti. I have requested a demo for Acunetix DeepScan technology, but I have yet to go through DeepScan. That was th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

I would say the pricing is average, but still, it is higher than low.

See all answers

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 5% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

Veracode vs Acunetix

Compared 4% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Comodo cWatch vs SiteLock

Compared 13% of the time

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs SiteLock

Compared 12% of the time

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 10% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs SiteLock

Compared 6% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

May 2026

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

April 2026

Download SiteLock product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix is a dynamic application security tool used globally for web application vulnerability scanning, focusing on SQL injection and cross-site scripting.

Acunetix provides a comprehensive web vulnerability assessment platform designed for identifying and remediating security threats. Users benefit from its ability to schedule scans, boasting a fast detection rate for common vulnerabilities. The tool's centralized dashboard helps organizations with compliance monitoring and features such as crawling and login sequence enhancements, contributing depth to its security assessments. Despite high praise for its integration capabilities and automated scanning that saves time, pricing and false positives present challenges. Organizations often use Acunetix to maintain internal security and evaluate pre-release environments.

What are Acunetix's main features?

Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed reports assist in security analysis and compliance audits.
User-Friendly Interface: Simple navigation enhances user experience.
Scheduled Scans: Automation of scans allows for continuous monitoring.
Fast Detection: Quickly identifies vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
Integration Capabilities: Scalable solutions with compatibility across applications.
Crawling & Login Sequence: Improves depth in security analysis.

What benefits should businesses look for in reviews?

Low False Positive Rate: Accurate vulnerability detection saves time in analysis.
Time Efficiency: Automated scans reduce manual workload, improving team productivity.
Scalability: Integration features help accommodate growth and complexity.
Compliance Support: Centralized dashboard supports regulatory compliance checks.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Acunetix assists in protecting sensitive data through robust scanning and reporting capabilities. Its ability to perform dynamic assessments makes it a chosen tool in regulatory environments and development settings, offering both internal security inspections and pre-release evaluations.

Invicti

SiteLock provides web security solutions focused on safeguarding websites against cyber threats and vulnerabilities. It offers businesses an effective way to protect their online presence, ensuring that their data and customers are secure.

SiteLock is a versatile web security platform designed to address the diverse security needs of businesses. It features continuous monitoring, malware protection, and advanced threat detection to fortify website defenses. Businesses can rely on SiteLock to protect against malicious attacks, ensuring data integrity and customer trust. Its easy integration with existing systems makes it a preferred choice for enhancing website security without disruption.

What are the key features of SiteLock?

Website Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities and malware threats regularly.
Malware Removal: Automated tools to remove harmful content quickly.
Firewall: Blocks malicious traffic to safeguard against DDoS attacks.
PCI Compliance: Helps meet industry security standards with ease.

What benefits should users expect from SiteLock?

Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring for peace of mind.
Cost-Effective: Reduces expenses related to breach management.
Customer Trust: Protecting data enhances brand credibility.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration without workflow interruptions.

SiteLock is tailored for various industries, including retail, healthcare, and financial services. Retailers benefit from protecting payment processing systems, while healthcare providers ensure patient data security. Financial services use SiteLock for safeguarding sensitive information, making it an essential component of their data protection strategy.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. SiteLock

April 2026

Free Report: Acunetix vs. SiteLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. SiteLock and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. SiteLock report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.