

Find out in this report how the two Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Automation with ActiveBatch by Redwood significantly reduced the repetitive operational work, improving analyst productivity by around 25 to 30%, mainly because less time was spent manually triggering these jobs, checking dependencies, or fixing missed schedules.
We require fewer team members to handle operations due to its robust automation.
I saw a roughly 25% time saving on routine operations with ActiveBatch by Redwood, and we needed fewer manual interventions, allowing my team to focus on other priorities because of this tool.
Files.com saved our time and our resources.
I have seen a return on investment using Files.com over other methods, saving money and time.
We have seen a return on investment, as our average time saving per week, when looked at across the whole year, saves us an average of 24 days in the whole year from a work perspective, which is equivalent to a saving of £19,000.
We often need to escalate issues to level two or three for solutions related to long-standing problems.
What stood out to me is that the platform has a lot of features, so having responsive support really helps when workflows become more complex.
Customer support for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been responsive and knowledgeable whenever we need any help.
The customer service rating is a ten out of ten, as they are pretty quick and accurate in supporting technical issues.
The documentation is incredible, and their willingness to expand upon existing features or implement new features based on requests is an incredible value.
Files.com's customer support is excellent, second to none.
In data-heavy processes involving API integrations, reporting, and ETL workflows, it supports growing workloads while also maintaining stable and organized execution.
ActiveBatch by Redwood's scalability is excellent; it experiences minimal failures and outages.
The scalability of ActiveBatch by Redwood is excellent.
From one to ten, the scalability rating is a ten.
Since starting to use it, it has been growing with us, managing increased connections and data payloads effortlessly.
Files.com's scalability is very easy to manage, as they have child domains or child sites within the main site that I can expand on the fly without needing any technical support.
Once workflows are properly configured, they can run continuously and predictably, reducing operational delays and manual follow-up work.
ActiveBatch by Redwood is highly reliable and runs jobs on schedule.
Files.com is pretty reliable, and we have not faced any downtime or any bug.
It maintains 100% uptime.
As far as uptime and reliability, it has been excellent.
On the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs.
Another improvement area could be smarter analytics or AI-driven recommendations, such as proactively identifying workflow bottlenecks, failed job patterns, or optimization suggestions instead of relying mostly on manual monitoring.
I rate ActiveBatch by Redwood an eight out of ten because it is powerful, but a perfect score would require a more modern, user-friendly interface and slightly faster performance.
Some UI functionalities, including file automations, could have a richer set of commands for scripting improvements and better visualization for building automations.
My third concern is that I now need to cancel it and no one has replied to me, and they've just charged me again, which is annoying because I wanted to be able to cancel and you cannot cancel within the platform.
The features you want to have, such as 24/7 premium technical support or data security standards, are included in their costly packages that need to be subscribed to.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great
The main benefit comes from the amount of manual effort and operational time saved through automation.
I think the pricing is fair, the setup cost was very easy, and licensing allows me to choose a larger number of user accounts to receive a discount.
Regarding pricing and setup costs, they have been favorable for our size, with minimal setup involved since it is a SaaS-based system, and licensing is straightforward and easy to manage.
I thought it was a very fair price, and we've been there three years, ready, eager, and excited to sign up for another three years with an increased license count, which I think is going to increase by 200.
The addition of AI has made troubleshooting and supporting users through ActiveBatch by Redwood quicker for me.
Automating the scheduled data workflows and integrations helped improve analyst productivity by around 25 to 30%.
Cross-platform integration helps my daily work as we automate tasks across Windows, Linux, and other cloud tools seamlessly.
The encryption, decryption on the fly, live links and inboxes stand out as great features.
When I say technical support is phenomenal, I recall when I was first evaluating Files.com and was not yet a paying customer; I had a couple of really good thirty-minute tech support phone calls or Zooms from some of the different tech people at Files.com while setting it up on my AWS server to receive files from my clients.
The biggest use case is integrating with S3 as either a mount point or a sync point so that file gateways can present those files to systems that use SMB/CIFS shares on a Windows environment.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Files.com | 1.4% |
| ActiveBatch by Redwood | 2.9% |
| Other | 95.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.
ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.
What important features does ActiveBatch offer?In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.
Files.com streamlines file management for businesses by offering a cloud-based platform with robust security and collaboration tools, enhancing efficiency in data handling and sharing.
Files.com provides a secure, centralized environment for storing, managing, and sharing files. With its diverse integrations, Files.com caters to industries needing reliable file workflows and compliance with stringent data security standards. It prioritizes ease of integration with existing tech stacks to simplify file sharing and automate workflows, reducing manual tasks. Focusing on security, Files.com protects sensitive data while facilitating seamless collaboration among team members, whether working remotely or co-located.
What are Files.com’s most noteworthy features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect from Files.com?
Files.com’s versatility is reflected in its application across industries like finance, healthcare, and software development, where secure data handling and compliance are paramount. By automating workflows and improving collaboration, Files.com supports critical data processes tailored to each industry’s specific requirements, enhancing productivity and ensuring data governance.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.