Actional vs JenniferSoft comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
186 views|147 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
JenniferSoft Logo
241 views|164 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and JenniferSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
MinLee
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The dashboard is a valuable feature.
Top Answer:The solution is pricy and has room for improvement.
Top Answer:I use JenniferSoft to monitor the performance and transaction traces of our applications.
Ranking
Views
186
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
241
Comparisons
164
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
216
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.

JenniferSoft Application Performance Management (APM) is a system management methodology that focuses on monitoring and managing application software performance and service utilization. Also, it is a tool that helps system availability and stable operation by monitoring and analyzing performance of operating systems. JENNIFER provides comprehensive and integrated performance monitoring through its many dashboard views, which include Real-user Monitoring and Real-time Topology. JENNIFER analyzes statistical data regarding system resources, application performance and errors with a view to achieving continuous and optimal service availability. JENNIFER's continuous monitoring helps with rapid detection and troubleshooting of performance problems. That can help prevent the problems from affecting service availability later. And minimizing system downtime and improving overall performance at the application and system levels greatly improves customer satisfaction.

Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
Standard Charter, SAS, SK, Mini Stop, AIG, SMBC, Prudential, Samsung, 3M, Meritz, LG, CJ, Pasco, Metr Asia Capital
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while JenniferSoft is ranked 50th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Actional is rated 9.0, while JenniferSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.