ACF2 vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Database Security category. Broadcom is ranked #13, while IBM is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Broadcom holds a 1.8% mindshare in DS, compared to IBM’s 26.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

ACF2

Read 6 ACF2 reviews

876 Views
289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Guardium Data ...

Read 80 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection reviews

7,290 Views
6,124 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

ACF2

IBM Security Guardium Data ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and ACF2 are competitors in data security. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection has a slight advantage due to its advanced analytical tools and streamlined deployment.

Features: IBM Security Guardium Data Protection offers robust data encryption, real-time monitoring, and automated compliance capabilities. It also provides comprehensive security through database activity monitoring and firewall features, making it adaptable to various environments. ACF2 focuses on strong access control, efficient multi-factor authentication, and seamless mainframe integration, appealing to those prioritizing system integration.

Room for Improvement: For IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, areas of improvement include enhancing user interface intuitiveness, expanding cloud compatibility, and reducing complexity in advanced feature deployment. ACF2 could benefit from improving the user experience for non-mainframe experts, expanding feature richness beyond integration, and enhancing its analytical tools to compete directly with IBM's offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer effective deployment models, but IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is notably more streamlined, reducing implementation time. IBM's customer support is perceived as more accessible and responsive, whereas ACF2 may require specialized mainframe knowledge for support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Guardium Data Protection has a higher initial setup cost but delivers significant long-term ROI through its comprehensive protection features. ACF2 presents competitive pricing but achieves a slightly lower ROI due to its focus on integration over feature richness. IBM offers better financial value concerning data protection expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACF2

Ranking in Database Security

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Security (4th)

IBM Security Guardium Data ...

Ranking in Database Security

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Database Security category, the mindshare of ACF2 is 1.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is 26.4%, down from 32.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection	26.4%
ACF2	1.8%
Other	71.8%

Database Security

Featured Reviews

reviewer1077621

IT Examiner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

A reliable, scalable product for security and auditing of our mainframe environment

It is a good product. It has been used for years. As long as it is configured correctly, it is a very stable product. It depends on how an institution or a company configures it. It depends on an institution's risk appetite. You need to make sure it is configured as per the concept of least privilege, and the logging features, detection and control mechanism, and other things like that are enabled. If you configure it to give access to the public, then there could be compromises. You should also have someone who independently checks it to make sure that it is configured keeping security in mind. If it has been configured for a while, when there are enhancements to the product or when you enhance it, you need to make sure that security is also looked at, and it is configured according to an institution's security policies. I would rate it a nine out of 10.

Read full review

Marylennis Franco

Jefe De Continuidad Operacional at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees

Has improved data visibility and streamlined compliance reporting across multiple database platforms

The best feature is how many databases we can protect with one solution because it has compatibility with different databases, including Oracle, SQL, and DB2. The data activity monitoring feature is very good because we can check the PDS and have the information for that. We can schedule the reporting and receive it by email, which provides very important information for different areas of the company. We don't need to have a seat and a case or access to the portal, we just receive the report. The user-friendly interface is very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use this tool to quickly assign privileges to different users as soon as they come in."

"By providing a high level of access control to the z/OS systems, ACF2 allows us to maintain tight controls on dataset and system access and helps us keep unauthorized users from accessing PHI or PII data."

"The NOACCESS by default is another very good feature. Also, access rules are straightforward, and easy to understand."

"Excellent real-time reporting that saves time and resources."

"I am deeply impressed with the quality and depth and breadth of security and functionality in CA’s ACF2 and Top Secret products."

"The most valuable feature is strict and reliable access control to CICS Resources."

"Without the product, extracting this information may take us as much as several days; instead, we can get it in real time."

"It is a good product."

More ACF2 pros

"Supports security initiatives and ensures compliance policies."

"Our internal audit is keeping an eye out, and making sure that we're in compliance. Having the Guardium solution and its reporting helps us get through that process a lot more quickly and efficiently."

"We succeeded at hardening our customer databases by defining policies for alerting and blocking access to prohibited and restricted data."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the performance of client monitoring. The other competitors are unable to do this."

"IBM Guardium Data Protection is very good at keeping your database secure."

"Data Activity Monitor covers what appears to be every DB imaginable, even data warehouses and file shares."

"It's made database monitoring more visible to the business, creating more conversations about how we should do it better."

"Audit Process Builder – Workflow generator to enhance audit tasks and compliance workflows."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection pros

Cons

"I would like my team and me to be able to use simple browsers, like Chrome, to be able to access mainframe data and provision users using the browser."

"They can work on its ability to work in a distributed environment."

"I would like my team and me to be able to use simple browsers, like Chrome, to be able to access mainframe data and provision users using the browser."

"The user access review could also be improved. It produces a lot of false positives."

"It needs longer rules. The max rule is 32K."

"They can work on its ability to work in a distributed environment. It's a mainframe product. As many companies move to the cloud, depending on what cloud models they choose, such as a public, hybrid, or private cloud, it should be deployable. I am not sure if it can be deployed on those platforms. It has been there since the '50s or '60s, and it's still scalable. It has survived all these years, and it's scalable to many platforms, but I don't know about the cloud."

"Reporting can sometimes include false positives."

"It needs longer rules. The max rule is 32K."

More ACF2 cons

"Using the data in native Guardium is difficult, at best."

"The solution should allow the data to shift to a centralized repository with elastic servers and big data infrastructure"

"Setup can be complex. The documentation is in so many different locations, and a lot of times we have to leverage support and higher level resources to figure out the right steps to take."

"There was a slight performance tax on the system and load balancing could be better."

"The solution could be improved for NoSQL databases."

"The installation should be a bit easier."

"We've had some issues recently that we're working through, on the agent software that runs on the databases."

"Sometimes the performance is not good, and also sometimes we have sudden bugs causing difficulties."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Guardium is most suitable for large scale enterprises because the pricing model is better if you are implementing a large number of databases."

"The biggest challenge is the cost associated with the product, and the cost of maintaining. Everything is not translated directly to the benefits we see. There are benefits, yes, but if I were writing the check, would I buy Guardium? No."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is very high price, I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Guardium has not saved us time or money."

"The price of the solution could be better."

"The cost depends on the number of databases. You can purchase advanced licenses, but the standard license is calculated based on the number of databases you have to onboard."

"My company purchased IBM Guardium Data Protection in a package, so I'm unable to give its exact licensing cost, but for the package of three IBM solutions, it wasn't very expensive. I'd rate the pricing for all three solutions three out of five. When my team deployed IBM Guardium Data Protection, all features were included."

"It is not an expensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	17
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does IBM Guardium Data Protection compare with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is a solution for database security from IBM that gives complete visibility, control, and analysis to secure sensitive data and comply with regulations. IBM S...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Guardium Data Protection?

I don't remember the exact prices, but Guardium is an expensive tool because it is targeted towards corporate enterprises.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Guardium Data Protection?

The features I like are the robust policies, which allow us to create customized monitoring based on specific activities.

See all answers

Comparisons

Top Secret vs ACF2

Compared 26% of the time

IBM Resource Access Control Facility vs ACF2

Compared 19% of the time

Cleanup vs ACF2

Compared 11% of the time

Precisely Ironstream vs ACF2

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Security zSecure vs ACF2

Compared 9% of the time

More ACF2 Competitors

Imperva Data Security Fabric vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 53% of the time

Oracle Audit Vault vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 11% of the time

DataSunrise Database Security vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Database Vault vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

Cleanup vs IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Compared 1% of the time

More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mainframe Security

April 2026

Download ACF2 product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

May 2026

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection report

Download IBM Security Guardium Data Protection product report

Also Known As

CA ACF2

InfoSphere Guardium, Guardium, IBM Guardium

Overview

ACF2 offers robust access control and security management for mainframe environments, supporting quick rule adjustments and effective monitoring, aiding in resource allocation and system resilience.

ACF2 is designed for the mainframe, providing stringent access control for CICS resources and effective user security management. Known for its default NOACCESS setup and straightforward access rules, it enables real-time log reporting and efficient monitoring. The platform supports quick rule changes, minimizing resource allocation time, which enhances security and resilience. Despite its strengths, ACF2 can improve by enhancing its Eclipse and browser interfaces and reducing manual processes. Desired improvements include flexible rules, better support for distributed environments, longer rule capabilities, and enhanced cloud deployment options. Organizations primarily use ACF2 to secure z/OS operating systems, manage user authentication, and access profiles and resources, maintaining updated versions for optimal security and efficiency.

What are the key features of ACF2?

Strict Access Control: Securely manages access to CICS resources with default NOACCESS.
User Security Management: Provides robust control over user privileges and security.
Swift Privilege Assignment: Enables quick assignment of user privileges for efficiency.
Real-Time Event Logging: Facilitates comprehensive log reporting and monitoring.
Rule Modification: Quickly adjusts rules to meet evolving security needs.

What benefits should users expect from ACF2?

Enhanced Security: Strengthens mainframe application security through strict access management.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces resource allocation time with swift rule changes.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports efficient logging and event reporting for security oversight.
Resource Resilience: Contributes to system resilience by optimizing resource allocation and control.

In industries relying on mainframes, such as finance and telecommunications, ACF2 is implemented for safeguarding z/OS environments by managing access and authentication processes securely. Companies maintain the latest version to ensure stringent protocol adherence, maximizing operational efficiency.

Broadcom

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection offers real-time data activity monitoring and advanced user behavior analytics to secure sensitive enterprise data and streamline compliance with regulations like PCI, SOX, HIPAA, and CCPA.

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection effectively discovers and classifies sensitive data across enterprises, providing comprehensive auditing and database protection. It enhances security through real-time access control, masking, and firewall capabilities, ensuring compatibility with diverse databases. It includes customizable reports and efficient alert systems, helping organizations manage privileged user access and detect unauthorized activities efficiently. While improvements in reporting, analytics, and cloud service support could enhance its performance, its GUI flexibility and vulnerability assessments make it a preferred choice for data security. Some users query the technical support and seek simpler upgrade processes and improved performance. The deployment is appreciated for its ease, yet integration capabilities are suggested to be strengthened for better usability.

What key features does IBM Security Guardium Data Protection offer?

Data Activity Monitoring: Offers real-time surveillance of database activities.
Advanced Auditing: Facilitates detailed audits to track data access.
Compliance Support: Provides pre-built templates for various regulations.
Access Control: Enforces stringent access controls and user management.
Masking and Firewall: Includes data masking and advanced firewall capabilities.
Customizable Reporting: Offers flexible reporting options to meet diverse needs.
Integration Options: Ensures seamless compatibility with different databases.

What benefits should users assess in reviews?

Comprehensive Security: Protects sensitive data through monitoring and encryption.
Regulatory Compliance: Simplifies compliance workflows across industries.
Real-Time Monitoring: Enhances immediate risk management through live tracking.
Flexible Performance: Provides varied integration options to suit different environments.
Efficient Alerts: Deploys an effective alert system to promptly identify threats.

In industries like finance, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is instrumental in monitoring privileged database access and ensuring compliance with stringent regulations such as PCI and GDPR. Organizations utilize its vulnerability assessments and audit trails to secure sensitive data against unauthorized access, manage risks, and maintain data integrity continuously.

IBM

Sample Customers

Sky, Rogers Communications

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

April 2026

Free Report: ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ACF2 vs. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection report.

See our list of best Database Security vendors.

We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.