ACCELQ Automate vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,022 Views
2,151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Testim based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: April 2025).

Test Automation Tools

Download the complete report

Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Testim

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 5.4%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"The product is easy to use."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 19% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 19% of the time

Eggplant Test vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

Functionize vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 48% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Test Automation Tools

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Download Testim product report

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

ACCELQ

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Test Automation Tools