ACCELQ Automate vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

ACCELQ and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. ACCELQ is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. ACCELQ holds a 1.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to SmartBear’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACCELQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

ACCELQ Automate

Read 1 ACCELQ Automate review

760 Views
760 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 76 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,342 Views
3,300 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

SmartBear TestComplete

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and SmartBear TestComplete based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (8th), Regression Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 5.8%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SmartBear TestComplete	5.8%
ACCELQ Automate	1.4%
Other	92.8%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"The product is stable for what we are currently using it for, and it is sufficient for us."

"It works very fine. It is fast on almost any machine, and it is also very well organized. I like its object mapping and its capability to find and interact with almost everything that exists on Windows."

"The integration with various tools is important."

"Selenium integration."

"TestComplete is simple, it's a very easy-to-use tool."

"This company offers end-to-end capabilities for test suite creation and execution. One feature that I particularly appreciate is the tagging system. Tags are highly valuable, as they allow you to assign tags to your test cases. When there's an impact in a specific area, you can search for and run all test cases associated with that tag. I find this functionality very useful."

"It is a strong automation tool for desktop, browser, and API testing."

"When compared to other tools, it is very simple."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"It is very hard to read the test log generated by TestComplete Executor if the log file is very big. TestComplete Executor is a small tool for just running the TestComplete test framework (not for developing)."

"Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work."

"To bring it up to a 10, I would be looking for the addition of some key functional API testing."

"The integration tools could be better."

"In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult."

"There could be API interfaces with this tool."

"The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."

"I didn't use it very heavily. One issue that I found was that there wasn't a quick way or a button to move Visual Basic scripts to TestComplete. We have a lot of such scripts in our organization, and it would be very useful to have some option to easily move these scripts. It is currently possible to convert these scripts to TestComplete, but it is not easy. I have to write some code, but everything is not available immediately."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The solution's licensing cost has increased because it has moved to some new SLM-based licenses."

"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."

"The solution's pricing is too high."

"Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day."

"It comes with a high cost."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

See all answers

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I am not involved in pricing or licensing; our management team handles these aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature. Occasion...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 24% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 19% of the time

LEAPWORK vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

Functionize vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 24% of the time

Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 11% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 6% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

December 2025

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

ACCELQ

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

SmartBear

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.