We use this solution to manage our storage and inner network solution.
Data Center Network Manager is good but it is not free and requires purchasing a separate license. It doesn't make sense to me - if you buy the switch the management software should be included with it.
The most valuable features of this solution are the devices, databases, and zoning.
The GUI client is Java-based and we know that Java is not secure, so everyone disables it.
It would be nice to have an HTML-based client.
The initial setup could be simplified.
I have been using this solution for six years.
We are not using the latest version. We are using version 8.3.
It's a stable solution. I don't have any issues with the stability of it.
The scalability is good.
We have three users in our organization who are using this solution. It is specifically for administration, and not for regular users.
This is a management piece for the storage area network. Only storage administrative users, use it.
We are increasing the usage. We have purchased some new switches.
I have contacted technical support and they are okay, once you pass the initial tier. The initial tier can help you with simple things.
For the more complex issues, it is almost always escalated to another level.
In my previous employment, I used a competitive product call Brocade Switches from HP, for SAN management.
I changed employment and the new company uses MDS. Both are similar.
Cisco is primarily used for Cisco environments. HP is more universal and it can manage any server, not just Cisco Servers, clients, and storage.
The initial setup was a bit complex. It is more on the complicated side than it is easy.
It took a month to deploy this solution.
I am responsible for the maintenance of it.
I completed the implementation myself.
It's perpetual licensing and maintenance is a recurrent cost.
I would recommend that you get training before using this solution.
I would rate Cisco MDS Series an eight out of ten.